UTILITY ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERITY OF CANCER-RELATED ANAEMIA (CRA)- A SOCIETAL VALUATION

Author(s)

Ossa DF1, Briggs A2, Cowell W3, Littlewood T4, Sculpher M5, 1 Occam Outcomes, Oxford, UK; 2 HERC – University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; 3 Healthcare Management Group – Roche, Welwyn Garden City, UK; 4 John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; 5 University of York, York, UK

OBJECTIVES: Anaemia is a common complication in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Although quality-of-life (QoL) in CRA has been studied, utility values related to anaemia severity are lacking. The UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) requests cost-utility analysis based on quality-adjusted life-years (QALY's) incorporating utilities elicited using public preferences. The objective was to use an appropriate method to estimate the impact of CRA, from a societal perspective. METHODS: A time-trade-off (TTO) questionnaire was designed and administered to a sample of laypeople: CRA health states were defined and described, based on the EuroQoL (EQ-5D) instrument, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Anaemia (FACT-An) instrument, and validated by clinical experts and cancer patients who had experienced anaemia. These descriptions were valued using the TTO elicitation method. Written informed consent was obtained and trained interviewers conducted surveys during February-March, 2004. RESULTS: In total, 110 respondents were interviewed; final analyses were performed on 106 respondents’ data. Resultant utility scores were converted to ratios, reflecting the baseline of ‘cancer and chemotherapy, with no anaemia’. Mean utility scores [SE] are 0.856 [0.014] for the no-anaemia state, and 0.781 [0.016], 0.615 [0.020] and 0.481 [0.020] for mild, moderate and severe anaemia states, respectively (Ratios of 1.00, 0.91, 0.72, and 0.56, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly highlights a societal view that severity of cancer-related anaemia will significantly affect patient utility. For example, a change from no-anaemia to severe anaemia is predicted to approximately halve utility, independent of other factors. TTO appears to be a valid, and sufficiently sensitive method to highlight this effect. The ratios of relative effect are applicable to a range of ‘baseline’ cancer utilities as multiplicative factors to estimate impact of anaemia within this broader context. These results could be incorporated within appraisals of therapies for CRA, and satisfy certain health technology assessment criteria.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2004-10, ISPOR Europe 2004, Hamburg, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 7, No. 6 (November/December 2004)

Code

PCN34

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health State Utilities

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×