THE ORGANIZED REGISTER OF CANADIAN HEALTH INFORMATION DATABASES (ORCHID) PROJECT- A RESEARCHER INTERFACE
Author(s)
Gibson D1, Barrette A1, Giraudi L1, Han D2, Koutsavlis T3, Schneider A4, Robinson K5, Potvin K6 1 Ventana Clinical Research Corporation, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2 Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Markham, ON, Canada; 3 Paladin Labs Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada; 4 Eli Lilly Canada Inc, Scarborough, ON, Canada; 5 Janssen-Ortho Inc, North York, ON, Canada; 6 Canada's Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies, Ottawa, ON, Canada
OBJECTIVES: To organize and classify existing Canadian health information databases into a searchable repository that will assist in identifying and assessing Canadian data available for health outcomes and related research. METHODS: The identification of Canadian health information databases began with a structured search strategy involving Medline (PubMed, OVID); Internet search engines; web sites of a number of organizations, universities and government bodies; and personal communications. Canadian databases with data from the year 2000 and onwards were included. Databases were assigned to one of four basic types (Administrative, Registry, Surveillance and Survey) and further classified in a hierarchical structure using categories, sub-categories and low-level terms. The three high-level categories were Medical Condition (MC), Population Health (PH) and Health Services Utilization (HSU). Approximately 20% of the identified databases were further profiled in detail, with recording of information on an additional 20 variable fields including sample size, data collection methods and data quality. RESULTS: The creation of a classification structure fully characterized the breadth and scope of the 255 unique databases initially identified. By database type, the largest proportion of databases was classified as survey (34%; n=87), followed by administrative (28%; n=72), registry (22%; n=56) and finally surveillance (16%; n=40). By non-exclusive database category, most were classified as PH (n=140), followed by HSU (n=116) and finally MC (n=114). Canadian health databases were found to provide information across a wide range of clinical conditions, particularly those related to high disease burden areas. In addition, they provided health utilization and determinant data. Some data gaps were recognized, such as environmental exposure data, data identifying specific subpopulations, and information needed to fully assess data quality. CONCLUSIONS: Classifying existing Canadian health information databases within a single, organized register is expected to provide an effective research tool in the planning of health outcomes and related research.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2004-10, ISPOR Europe 2004, Hamburg, Germany
Value in Health, Vol. 7, No. 6 (November/December 2004)
Code
PHP28
Topic
Real World Data & Information Systems
Topic Subcategory
Health & Insurance Records Systems
Disease
Multiple Diseases