DERIVING UNIT COSTS FOR RESOURCE UTILISATION IN PROSPECTIVE URINARY INCONTINENCE RESEARCH (PURE) - AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY IN 14 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Author(s)

Papanicolaou S1, Davies A2, Espuña-Pons M3, Hampel C4, Hunskaar S5, Monz B6, Samsioe G7, Wagg A8, Sykes D9, 1 Eli Lilly and Company Limited, Windlesham, Surrey, UK; 2 MEDTAP International, London, UK; 3 University Hospital of Barcelona, Spain; 4 University Hospital of Mainz, Germany; 5 University of Bergen, Norway; 6 Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany; 7 Lunds University Hospital, Sweden; 8 University College Hospital, London, UK; 9 Eli Lilly and Company Limited, Windlesham, UK

OBJECTIVES: To collect and compare unit costs for resource use data in PURE, an observational study with the primary objective to determine the direct cost of urinary incontinence (UI) treatment in Europe. METHODS: Resource use data include medication, conservative treatment, diagnostic and surgical procedures, incontinence products and visits to health care providers. Unit costs by country and type were collected using a standardized data collection form. OECD consumer price indices and purchasing power parity figures were used to convert prices into 2003/2004 values and US dollars respectively. Prices were then converted into Euros using an exchange rate of 1$=0.84€ (June 2004). RESULTS: Unit costs were derived from standard national pricelists for medications, retail prices for incontinence products, DRG (Diagnosis-related Groups) data for surgical interventions where applicable, or costs of procedures and overnight stays derived from hospitals in the remaining countries. The costs of conservative therapy, incontinence products and health care visits varied between countries within reasonable limits due to different health care systems and practice patterns. Health care contacts were reported at a range of 10€ or less to 260€ depending on the type of provider. For diagnostic interventions similar costs were observed across the countries, except for more complex procedures. The cost of an urodynamic test was within the range of 70-175€ other than in Denmark (13€) and Spain (260€). For countries with DRG systems variability in unit costs of surgical procedures for UI appears low. In non-DRG systems procedure costs (including length of stay in surgical wards) are comparable to DRGs. CONCLUSIONS: Unit costs for UI treatment vary between the differing healthcare settings within Europe. The standardized collection of unit cost data in PURE is the prerequisite for determining UI-related costs of care in this multinational setting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2004-10, ISPOR Europe 2004, Hamburg, Germany

Value in Health, Vol. 7, No. 6 (November/December 2004)

Code

PUK22

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×