COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF LAMIVUDINE MONOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS B
Author(s)
Xin Sun, MPharm, Research Associate1, Rongle Zhou, MSc, Ms2, Pan Li, MSc, Ms2, Youping Li, MSc, Professor3, Gordon Guyatt, MD, Professor41The Chinese Cochrane Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; 2 West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; 3 Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; 4 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
OBJECTIVE: To investigate effectiveness of lamivudine monotherapy compared to other antivirals for patients with chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials were conducted. Medline, Cochrane Trial Register, Current Contents, SCI-E and CBMdisc were searched. Complementary screening of references of included studies was also conducted. Randomized trials that compared lamivudine monotherapy with single use of other antivirals for patients with chronic hepatitis B were eligible. Studies that included patients with co-infection of HCV and HIV, and with decompensate liver diseases were excluded. Outcomes measures were loss of HBeAg, seroconversion, loss of HBV-DNA, and normalization of ALT. Egger's regression and funnel plot were used to identify publication bias. Meta-regression, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to investigate heterogeneity. Type of comparison, duration, doses, and ethnicity were considered for heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of eleven included trials formed thirteen comparisons, without publication bias identified (coefficient=-1.52, 95%CI: -3.85-0.81). Of these, seven compared with interferon-alpha, five with nucleic analogues, and one with thymocin-alpha. Seven of eleven trials (63.6%) were moderate in quality, and three trials (27.3%) were high. Lamivudine was inferior to other antivirals in loss of HBeAg (OR=0.45, 95%CI: 0.30-0.67), without heterogeneity identified (chi-square=5.47, df=6, p=0.485). Although heterogeneous across trials in loss of HBV-DNA (chi-square=47.33, df=11, p=0.000), no specific factors were identified. It showed that lamivudine was comparable to other antivirals (OR=1.39, 95%CI=0.67-2.88). The comparison of lamivudine with interferon also identified no significant difference. Ethnic difference was the prognostic factor for addressing heterogeneity in normalization of ALT (coefficient=2.56, 95%CI=0.62-4.51, P=0.015). Lamivudine could produce more significant normalization of ALT than other antivirals in Chinese. Lamivudine was comparable to other antivirals in seroconversion. CONCLUSIONS: There was advantage of lamivudine in normalization of ALT. However, it was clinically inferior to other antivirals in decreasing HBeAg.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2006-03, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2006, Shanghai, China
Code
GI3
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Gastrointestinal Disorders