A COMPARISON OF ADULT MIGRAINE TREATMENT REGIMENS IN A MANAGED CARE POPULATION

Author(s)

Eaddy M1, Mcloney A2, Margraf T3, Okamoto L2, 1University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; 2NDC Health Information Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA 3PharMetrics, Inc, Boston, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To compare costs and characteristics of migraine patients receiving triptan therapy versus those not receiving triptan therapy. METHODS: All patients possessing a migraine diagnosis (ICD-9-CM=346) in the PharMetrics Integrated Outcomes Database over the age of 18 between January 1, 1997and March 31, 1998 were eligible for inclusion. Subjects were required to be in the database for at least 3 months prior to and 3 months following the index date. Any subject receiving migraine treatment prior to their first diagnosis was excluded from the study. Subjects were categorized as being in either the triptan or non-triptan treatment groups based on the presence of a triptan prescription during the 90 days following their index date. Subject demographics, comorbidities and utilization of other migraine treatments were assessed, and compared across treatment groups. Charges were captured over a 90-day period following the index date. RESULTS: A total of 8,018 patients met the inclusion criteria. Approximately 85% were female and the mean age was 41.62 (Std. Dev=12.64). Over 90% did not receive a triptan prescription within 90 days of the index date. Hypertension was less commonly observed in triptan users; all other comorbidities occurred equally in both groups. Triptan users were more likely to consume other anti-migraine drugs than non-triptan users. Costs were very similar in triptan users (mean=$1751 Std. Dev.=4142) and non-triptan users (mean=$1613 Std Dev 5193). CONCLUSIONS: Triptans did not appear to be commonly prescribed following an initial migraine diagnosis. Despite increased anti-migraine drug usage in triptan users, costs between triptan and non-triptan users were very similar.

Conference/Value in Health Info

1999-11, ISPOR Europe 1999, Edinburgh, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 2, No. 5 (September/October1999)

Code

PCN4

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×