ASSESSING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COX-2 SPECIFIC INHIBITORS FOR ARTHRITIS IN THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
Author(s)
Schaefer M1, DeLattre M1, Gao X2, Stephens J2, Botteman M2, Morreale A1, 1VA San Diego Health care System, San Diego, CA, USA; 2Abt Associates Clinical Trials, Bethesda, MD, USA
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the cost-effectiveness of cyclooxygenase-2 specific (COX-2) inhibitors (rofecoxib and celecoxib) over non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in high-risk arthritis patients from the perspective of the Veterans Health Administration (VA). METHODS: This literature-based economic analysis compared rofecoxib and celecoxib to NSAIDS in two arthritis patient populations considered at higher risk of developing clinically significant upper gastrointestinal events (CSUGIEs): 1) patients of any age with previous medical history of perforation/ulcer/bleed (PUB), and 2) patients 65 years and older (regardless of history of PUB). Two outcomes measures were reported 1) incremental cost per CSUGIE averted over 1 year, and 2) incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, considering both the mortality and morbidity associated with gastrointestinal (including CSUGIEs) and cardiovascular-related adverse events. When possible, costs were modeled to reflect the VA perspective. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the analysis. RESULTS: Compared to NSAIDS, rofecoxib and celecoxib increased costs but reduced the incidence of CSUGIE. Cost per CSUGIE avoided were $7,476 and $16,379 (in patients with a PUB history) and $14,294 and $18,376 (in patients aged > 65 years) for celecoxib and rofecoxib, respectively. In both populations, celecoxib was associated with a cost per QALY less than $50,000. In contrast, rofecoxib was found to cost more and result in a net QALYs loss, due in particular to the increase in the risk of cardiovascular complications, and was therefore considered cost-ineffective. Results were most dependent on assumptions about the incidence of cardiovascular events and CSUGIE and the COX-2 inhibitors acquisition price. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that the COX-2 inhibitors may be cost-effective from the perspective of the VA. However, cost-effectiveness appears to depend less on the specific characteristics of the high-risk target population considered but more on the agent evaluated.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2004-05, ISPOR 2004, Arlington, VA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 7, No. 3 (May/June 2004)
Code
AR1
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders