VALIDATION OF THE PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE/URINARY INCONTINENCE SEXUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE IN ITALIAN WOMEN. THE GYNAEFLOW STUDY

Author(s)

Lucia Simoni, Statistics, PhD1, Patrizia Lessi, Medical, Dr, Dr2, Walter Artibani, MD, Professor of Urology3, Michele Meschia, Medical, Dr, Prof4, Mauro Cervigni, Medical, Dr, Prof5, R Milani, Medical, Dr, Prof6, Gianfranco Minini, Medical, Dr, Prof7, Diego Riva, Medical, Dr, Dr8, Alessandra Graziottin, Medical, Dr, Dr91MediData srl, Modena, Italy; 2 Boehringer Ingelheim, Milan, Italy; 3 University of Padova, Padova, Padova, Italy; 4 Az. Osp. di Legnano P.O. Magenta - Ostetricia Ginecologia, Magenta, Italy; 5 Ospedale S. Carlo di Nancy - Ostetricia Ginecologia, Roma, Italy; 6 Ospedale Bassini - Ostetricia Ginecologia, Milan, Italy; 7 Az. Osp. Spedali Civili - Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale di Uroginecologia, Brescia, Italy; 8 Ospedale di Cantù - Ginecologia, Como, Italy; 9 Istituto S. Raffaele, Milan, Italy

OBJECTIVES: The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12), a condition-specific self-rating questionnaire, comprises 12 items investigating sexual functionality in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or urinary incontinence (UI). The scale investigates behavioural emotive, physical and partner-related factors. This paper reports on the Italian validation of the PISQ-12. METHODS: The linguistic validation of the scale consisted of forward and backward translation. It was performed through a multi-step process, which involved two Italian mother-tongue professionals and a native English speaker co-working with clinical investigators. This version was pre-tested on a set of 49 women, who were interviewed after filling-in the questionnaire and a comprehension rate was built as the percentage of correctly understood questions and pre-coded answers. A case-control study was performed. Sexually active women aged >= 18 year and affected by UI/POP for at least 3 months and with negative dipstick were consecutively enrolled as cases. Controls were defined as healthy women of comparable age. In order to evaluate reliability, cases were retested after 7-21 days from baseline and a correlation analysis was performed. RESULTS: For 10 out of 12 items >90% patients found the Italian version easy to understand. Nine patients reported they could not understand the first item: How frequently do you feel sexual desire? This feeling may include wanting to have sex, planning to have sex, feeling frustrated due to lack of sex; 42% of patients did not interpret frustration as delusion. This item was also differently translated during the forward translation and discussed. Five patients did not correctly understand Item 4: How satisfied are you with the variety of sexual activities in you current sex life?, as regards the word variety. CONCLUSION: The PISQ-12 proved to be easy to understand and suitable for clinical research and routine. The evaluation of psychometric properties is on-going.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2006-10, ISPOR Europe 2006, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Vol. 9, No.6 (November/December 2006)

Code

PUK28

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×