SELF MONITORING OF BLOOD GLUCOSE IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES- COST UTILITY ANALYSIS IN A FRENCH GOVENMENT PAYER SETTING

Author(s)

Andrew J. Palmer, MD, Principal1, Michael E. Minshall, MPH, Principal2, William J. Valentine, PhD, Medical Writer1, Volker Foos, MSc, Disease Model Programmer1, Sandra L. Tunis, PhD, Senior Consultant21IMS, Allschwil, Switzerland; 2 IMS, Fishers, IN, USA

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown that for patients with type 2 diabetes, self monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) can improve glycemic control (with HbA1c improvements of 0.3-0.6%, depending on treatment received). This in turn, can reduce risks of disease complications. Because monitoring supplies can have high acquisition costs, country-specific evaluations of SMBG cost-effectiveness are needed. The aim of this analysis was to estimate, within France, the cost-effectiveness of using SMBG. METHODS: A validated, published model for type 2 diabetes (The CORE Diabetes Model) was used to project improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), long-term costs and cost-effectiveness of SMBG. A series of Markov models simulated the progression of diabetes-related complications (cardiovascular, neuropathy, renal and eye disease). Transition probabilities and HbA1c-dependent adjustments came from major epidemiological studies. Costs of complications were derived from published sources. From the government payer perspective, direct costs of diabetes complications and of SMBG were projected over patient lifetimes. Outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: Depending on type of treatment (diet/exercise, oral medications, or insulin), greater glycemic control with SMBG improved (discounted) QALE by 0.10 to 0.15 QALYs and increased total costs by €323 to €703 per patient. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from €3220 to €7276 per QALY gained, and were well within current willingness-to-pay limits. SMBG was most cost-effective in the sub-group of patients being treated with oral antidiabetic medication. CONCLUSIONS: Within the three treatment regimens examined, the addition of SMBG was associated with increased glycemic control and with improved clinical and economic long-term outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were of magnitudes typically considered to indicate good value for money within the French health care setting. Additional comparative studies are needed to further assess Utilities and other standard outcomes associated with SMBG in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2006-10, ISPOR Europe 2006, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Vol. 9, No.6 (November/December 2006)

Code

PDB16

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×