ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL ANAESTHESIA AND POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA USING A PAIN VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE

Author(s)

Yfantopoulos Y1 Athanasiadis A2 Karokis A3 Tsekouras V3, Yourgioti G3, Pierrakos G1, Pagouni H4, Hantziandreou E5, 1University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 2Hellenic Airforce Hospital, Athens, Greece, 3Astra Hellas, Athens, Greece, 4Nikea General Hospital, Athens, Greece, 5ASTRA A.B, Athens, Greece

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of general (GA) Vs epidural (EA) Vs Spinal (SA) Vs a combination (GEA) anesthetic technique in terms of pain relief for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. METHOD: In a prospective cohort open label multi-center study in three major general hospitals in Athens, Greece, all 210 patients undergoing hip arthroplasty during a period of one calendar year ending 25/12/1998 underwent face to face interviews after surgery and for four consecutive postoperative days. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure intensity of pain on a continuous scale with the ends marked as “no pain” (0mm) and “worst pain ever” (100mm) twice daily. After controlling for demographics and ASA status, the study arms were compared on the basis of physician-suggested clinically meaningful pain intervals of: 0-30VAS (excellent analgesia), 31-50VAS (good analgesia), 51-70VAS (bad analgesia) and 71-100VAS (insufficient analgesia). Ordinary least square regressions were run with pain intensity as dependent variable and clinical, organizational, physician and patient characteristics as independent ones. RESULTS: Immediately after surgery, EA and GEA present statistically significant higher numbers of patients in the 0-30VAS interval than the rest two anesthesia techniques (p.005). EA and GEA also show lower numbers of patients at the “bad” and “insufficient” analgesia intervals at a statistically significant level during the study period, except for the third postoperative day. In regression analysis, locus of postoperative pain management responsibility, analgesia technique, and hospital practice variations significantly accounted for clinically meaningful differences in postoperative pain levels. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural and general/epidural anesthetic techniques result in more patients with excellent analgesia immediately after hip arthroplasty. The use of continuous postoperative epidural analgesia (CEPA) technique together with assigning anesthesiologists responsibility for post operative pain management result in better pain relief during a period of four postoperative days.

Conference/Value in Health Info

1999-05, ISPOR 1999, Arlington, VA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 2, No. 3 (May/June 1999)

Code

PCP8

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×