ASSESSING PATIENT CARE AND COST OF PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES IN GERMANY- AN ANALYSIS ACROSS DIFFERENT TREATMENT TYPES
Author(s)
Goertz A1, Spannheimer A2, Reitberger U2, Liebl A3, Wagenpfeil S4, 1GlaxoSmithKline, Munich, Germany; 2Kendle International Inc, Munich, Germany; 3Diabetes Stoffwechselzentrum Tegernsee, Rottach-Egern, Germany; 4Institute for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology at Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
OBJECTIVES: To assess antidiabetic treatment and associated costs of patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany. METHODS: In a cost of illness study based on a representative sample of 809 patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment strategies, overall resource use and cost were investigated for the year 1998. This analysis is centred on the question of how the antidiabetic treatment influences resource use and cost. Taking the perspective of the statutory health insurance, overall direct and indirect health-care costs for diabetes patients were investigated. RESULTS: Among all patients, 19% were treated with diet and exercise only, 53% received oral anti-diabetics (OAD) and 28% were insulin recipients. The three treatment groups differed in terms of time since diagnosis of diabetes and complication status, with the most severe cases in the insulin group. Total costs were highest for patients taking insulin and amounted to 4,100 Euro. For patients on diet/exercise and on OAD total costs were 2,242 Euro and 2,184 Euro, respectively. Similarly, the cost of medication was also highest for patients taking insulin (1,296 Euro) compared to patients on OAD (576 Euro) or diet (484 Euro). The cost of hospitalisation and rehabilitation was approximately half the total cost in each group (insulin 2,166 Euro, OAD 1,105 Euro, diet 1,047 Euro). Patients on diet had similar total and inpatient costs to patients on OAD, but had highest indirect cost. A regression analysis was used to determine the influence of treatment type, time since diagnosis of diabetes and complication status on total costs. Insulin treatment and complication status had a significant impact (p < .0001) on total costs whereas time since diagnosis and other treatment types had none. CONCLUSIONS: The disease progression is reflected by the change in antidiabetic treatment. The highest costs were observed in patients treated with insulin. These patients also experience more severe complications.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2001-11, ISPOR Europe 2001, Cannes, France
Value in Health, Vol. 4, No. 6 (November/December 2001)
Code
PDG13
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders