A DECISION-ANALYSIS MODEL FOR ENHANCING MEDICATION ADHERENCE IN PATIENTS TAKING STATINS
Author(s)
Peterson AM1, McGhan WF2 , 1Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA
OBJECTIVE: Controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the positive impact of statin therapy on health outcomes in hyperlipidemic patients. The positive impact of adherence is seemingly intuitive and many programs have been designed to improve adherence. However, there are few studies analyzing the cost-effectiveness of medication adherence interventions. This decision analysis model will examine the cost-effectiveness of programs designed to enhance medication adherence in patients taking statins. The model varies the medication-adherence rate and program costs to determine the differences in the expected outcome of three different types of intervention. METHODS: Data from published clinical and pharmacoeconomic studies were entered into a decision analysis model. A Monte Carlo simulation using 10,000 trials was used with beta distributions for the assumptive variables. The baseline adherence rate was set at 67% and the cardiovascular event rate at 1.5%. Behavioral (B) type interventions were assumed to increase adherence by 8.61%, Educational (E) interventions by 11.22% and Combined (C) B and E by 17.04%. Program costs were estimated as follows: B=$200, E=$100, and C=$225 per patient. Cardiovascular and serious medication-related events were also used as outcomes. The cost-per-patient-per-event avoided was calculated. ANOVA was used to test for differences among intervention types. RESULTS: The results showed the interventions increased the number of events avoided in the first year by 0.04 (95% CI=-0.04,0.12) for B, by 0.06 (95%CI=-0.02, 0.14) for E and by 0.08 (95%CI=0.02, 0.14) for C. The cost per-event-per-patient avoided in the first year of treatment was B=$6,038, E=$2,568 and C=$3,839. There was a statistical difference among all intervention types with respect to cost of events avoided. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the number of events avoided in the first year of statin treatment with respect to intervention type. While C interventions yielded more events avoided, E interventions appear to be the most cost-effective. More study on the cost-effectiveness of medication adherence programs is required.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2001-11, ISPOR Europe 2001, Cannes, France
Value in Health, Vol. 4, No. 6 (November/December 2001)
Code
PCV31
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders