SOCIECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CILOSTAZOL FOR THE SECONDARY PREVENTION OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION IN JAPAN
Author(s)
Kobayashi M1, Gotoh F2, 1Crecon Research and Consulting Inc., Tokyo, Japan; 2School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
The use of such anti-platelet agents as aspirin and ticlopidine have not been approved in Japan for use in the prevention of the recurrence of cerebrovascular diseases that include cerebral infarction. Cilostazol is an anti-platelet agent indicated for the treatment of ischemic symptoms, including ulcer, pain, and cold sensation in chronic arterial occlusion, but it also has been confirmed to be effective over a placebo with respect to the prevention of cerebral infarction recurrences through a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multi-center clinical trial (RCT). OBJECTIVES: To estimate the socioeconomic impact of cilostazol with concern to the prevention of cerebral infarction recurrences in Japan. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to estimate the costs and the number of recurrences of cerebral infarction over a 5-year period for 50-year-old males. Annual average rates of cerebral infarction recurrences were derived from the RCT. QALYs were not considered due to a lack of utility data in Japan. Direct costs and indirect costs were calculated based on published data. Costs and the numbers of recurrences were discounted at 3% per annum. RESULTS: The cumulative number of recurrences of cerebral infarction over 5 years per 1000 people were 95 for the cilostazol group, and 272 for the no treatment group. The 5 year cumulative costs per person were 5,260,108 yen for the cilostazol group, and 11,374,638 yen for the no treatment group. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that cilostazol is a valid form of treatment for the prevention of cerebral infarction recurrences in Japan from a socioeconomic standpoint.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2000-05, ISPOR 2000, Arlington, VA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 3, No. 2 (March/April 2000)
Code
PCD7
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders