ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF A COMPLIANCE PROGRAM IN PATIENTS WITH STATIN THERAPY – DESIGN AND PILOT PHASE OF THE ORBITAL STUDY

Author(s)

Upmeier H1, Müller-Nordhorn J1, Sonntag F2, Voeller H3, Wegscheider K4, Windler E5, Meyer-Sabellek W6, Katus HA7, Willich SN1, 1Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité Hospital, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 2GP, Henstedt-Ulzburg, Germany; 3Rehabilitation Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Rüdersdorf, Germany; 4University of Hamburg, Berlin, Germany; 5Medizinische Kernklinik und Poliklinik, Hamburg, Germany; 6AstraZeneca GmbH, Wedel, Germany; 7Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

OBJECTIVES: In the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease patient compliance with established risk-reducing factors remains inadequate. The primary objective of the ORBITAL Study is to evaluate the impact of a compliance enhancing program in patients receiving statin therapy on long-term disease-related outcomes and costs. Here the design and results of the pilot phases are presented. METHODS: Approximately 7000 patients eligible for statin therapy (Joint European Guidelines) will be enrolled nationwide in primary care practices in Germany. Patients will be randomised into an intervention group (12-month rosuvastatin plus compliance program) and a control group (12-month rosuvastatin alone). Disease-related costs, quality of life, cardiovascular events, and compliance will be assessed every 6 months during the 36 months follow-up. The compliance program was developed based on previous studies, expert advice, and pilot testing, and includes a start package with a video and an information brochure, followed by mailings and telephone calls. The program addresses factors such as diet and lifestyle in addition to compliance with pharmacotherapy. The information brochure and telephone calls were evaluated in two subsequent pilot phases. RESULTS: In the first pilot phase, 23 of 25 contacted patients in a cardiac rehabilitation center considered the brochure to be easy to understand although some criticized the use of too many medical terms. 17% of patients considered the brochure to be too long. In the second pilot phase, 70 patients were randomised into intervention (n=37) or control (n=33) groups. The majority of the intervention patients expressed high satisfaction with the telephone calls although 10% indicated the calls contained too much information and should be shortened. CONCLUSION: With regard to the compliance initiatives evaluated, the importance of not overloading patients with information became apparent. Therefore, the compliance enhancing program was revised accordingly for the main phase of the ORBITAL Study, which started in May 2002 and is scheduled to run for 3 years.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2002-11, ISPOR Europe 2002, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Value in Health, Vol. 5, No. 6 (November/December 2002)

Code

PCV14

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×