COST-EFFICACY OF ZOLEDRONIC 4MG ACID VS. PAMIDRONATE 90MG IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERCALCEMIA OF MALIGNACY (HCM)
Author(s)
Badia X1, Slof EJ2, Magaz S1, Bautista J3, Domínguez-Gil A4, Mangues MA5, Pla R6, Rodríguez JM7, Wood MA8, 1Health Outcomes Research Europe, Barcelona, Spain; 2Health Outcomes Research Europe and Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain; 3Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; 4Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 5Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; 6Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain; 7Hospital de Galdakao, Galdakao, Spain; 8Hospital Universitario Materno Infantil de Canarias, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
OBJECTIVES: In clinical trials zoledronic acid has shown higher efficacy in HCM treatment than pamidronate, currently the drug most widely used. This study evaluated both treatment options from an economic perspective. METHODS: The main outcome measures were incremental cost-efficacy ratios of zoledronic acid 4 mg vs. pamidronate 90 mg perfusions. From the hospital perspective, data on direct, short-term variable resources consumed during drug administration were collected from seven Spanish hospitals using a structured questionnaire. Efficacy data (rate and duration of complete response) were extracted from controlled clinical trials. RESULTS: In total the participating hospitals treated 271 patients/year (93% in outpatient infusion sites). Apart from a price difference of €65.97, differences in resource consumption were related to perfusion times and subsequent demand on personnel, and certain supplies. Time taken for perfusion preparation through to its finalization was considerably longer with pamidronate: for every patient treated with pamidronate on average 3.5 could be treated with zoledronic acid. Under normal clinical practice (permanent patient vigilance and infusion times according to labeling instructions), zoledronic acid required 105 minutes less nursing time, valued at €26.25. Given that also fewer supplies were used (costing €7.29), the total cost difference reduced to an additional €32.43 with zoledronic acid. According to the clinical trials, 18.7 percentage points more patients had a complete response with zoledronic acid than with pamidronate, and average duration of complete response per treatment administered was 4.1 days longer. Thus incremental costs amounted to €173.68 per additional complete response and €7.82 per additional day of complete response. These results are dependent on clinical practice, particularly regarding the savings in personnel costs, and could be higher or lower in circumstances that are different to the most frequent scenario considered here. CONCLUSION: Compared to pamidronate, zoledronic acid considerably shortens treatment time and has an acceptable incremental cost-efficacy ratio.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2002-11, ISPOR Europe 2002, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Value in Health, Vol. 5, No. 6 (November/December 2002)
Code
PCN9
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic