TREATMENT BURDEN ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENT ANTICOAGULATION STRATEGIES OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PATIENTS- AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY IN GERMANY, SWEDEN AND SWITZERLAND BASED ON THE ANTI-CLOT TREATMENT SCALE

Author(s)

Wilke T1, Bloempott S2, Henry M3, Mueller S2
1IPAM, University of Wismar, Wismar, Germany, 2Ingress-Health HWM GmbH, Wismar, Germany, 3Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany

OBJECTIVES

:
Treatment satisfaction as perceived by patients is known to be associated with long-term treatment adherence/persistence and real-world treatment outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess treatment satisfaction reported by atrial fibrillation (AF) patients receiving oral anticoagulation treatment (OAC) with either vitamin-K-antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) based on the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS).

METHODS

:
Randomly selected GP/cardiologist study sites in Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland were asked to enroll AF patients receiving either VKAs or NOACs for at least three months into this cross-sectional study. In addition to documentation of clinical data by study physicians, patients were interviewed based on a written questionnaire at the time of inclusion. Treatment burden/benefit was assessed by the ACTS, which is a 15-item validated questionnaire assessing satisfaction with anticoagulation treatment.

RESULTS

: Reported ACTS burden scale reached a mean of 18.2 (range: 13-58; higher values indicating higher burden). Reported treatment burden was significantly higher for patients treated with VKAs versus NOACs (19.1 versus 17.2, p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the following independent variables were associated with higher ACTS-treatment burden: VKA treatment, younger age, lower BMI and lower physical/mental health (SF-36). Furthermore, Swedish patients reported higher burden.

Reported ACTS benefit scale reached a mean of 8.5 (range: 4-20; higher values indicating less benefit). Based on applied multivariate regression model, no significant explanatory factors of the ACTS treatment benefit could be identified with one exception: Swedish patients reported less treatment benefit, compared to patients in Germany/Switzerland.

CONCLUSIONS

:
Anticoagulation treatment with VKAs was associated with a higher treatment burden as measured by the ACTS, in comparison to NOAC treatment. There were no differences between perceived OAC benefits if VKAs and NOACs are compared.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PCV152

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×