TREATMENT BURDEN ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENT ANTICOAGULATION STRATEGIES OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PATIENTS- AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY IN GERMANY, SWEDEN AND SWITZERLAND BASED ON THE ANTI-CLOT TREATMENT SCALE
Author(s)
Wilke T1, Bloempott S2, Henry M3, Mueller S2
1IPAM, University of Wismar, Wismar, Germany, 2Ingress-Health HWM GmbH, Wismar, Germany, 3Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
OBJECTIVES: Treatment satisfaction as perceived by patients is known to be associated with long-term treatment adherence/persistence and real-world treatment outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess treatment satisfaction reported by atrial fibrillation (AF) patients receiving oral anticoagulation treatment (OAC) with either vitamin-K-antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) based on the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS). METHODS: Randomly selected GP/cardiologist study sites in Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland were asked to enroll AF patients receiving either VKAs or NOACs for at least three months into this cross-sectional study. In addition to documentation of clinical data by study physicians, patients were interviewed based on a written questionnaire at the time of inclusion. Treatment burden/benefit was assessed by the ACTS, which is a 15-item validated questionnaire assessing satisfaction with anticoagulation treatment. RESULTS: Reported ACTS burden scale reached a mean of 18.2 (range: 13-58; higher values indicating higher burden). Reported treatment burden was significantly higher for patients treated with VKAs versus NOACs (19.1 versus 17.2, p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the following independent variables were associated with higher ACTS-treatment burden: VKA treatment, younger age, lower BMI and lower physical/mental health (SF-36). Furthermore, Swedish patients reported higher burden. Reported ACTS benefit scale reached a mean of 8.5 (range: 4-20; higher values indicating less benefit). Based on applied multivariate regression model, no significant explanatory factors of the ACTS treatment benefit could be identified with one exception: Swedish patients reported less treatment benefit, compared to patients in Germany/Switzerland. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation treatment with VKAs was associated with a higher treatment burden as measured by the ACTS, in comparison to NOAC treatment. There were no differences between perceived OAC benefits if VKAs and NOACs are compared.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PCV152
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders