THE ROLE OF PERFORMANCE-BASED RISK-SHARING AGREEMENTS IN MINIMISING PAYER UNCERTAINTY WHEN STANDARD OF CARE IS NOT CLEARLY DEFINED; THE EXAMPLE OF CROHN’S DISEASE RELATED COMPLEX PERIANAL FISTULAS

Author(s)

Schmetz A1, Kaur S2, Petrakis I3, Agboton C4, Azzabi Zouraq I4, Minda K4, Rawson K1, Campbell-Hill S5, Baumgart DC6
1Evidera Market Access, London, UK, 2Parexel International, Chandigarh, India, 3Takeda International, Zurich, Switzerland, 4Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Zurich, Switzerland, 5Takeda Pharmaceuticals UK, High Wycombe, UK, 6University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

OBJECTIVES: Where standard of care (SoC) is not clearly defined, incremental benefit/cost uncertainty for new treatments can be a challenge for reimbursement decision making. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the variability in SoC options for the management of complex peri-anal fistulas (CPAF) in Crohn’s Disease (CD), their effectiveness, and associated costs and to explore the role of performance-based risk-sharing agreements (PBRSA). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, MEDLINE In-Process, and COCHRANE were searched for the timeframe 2000 to 22nd January 2018 to retrieve relevant publications regarding management patterns and guidelines, economic and humanistic burden of CPAF. Following systematic literature review (SLR), 5 semi-structured interviews with current and former European payers were conducted to understand usefulness of PBRSAs in CPAF treatment. RESULTS: The SLR identified six European treatment guidelines, three treatment pattern studies, two studies assessing economic burden, and 12 studies reporting humanistic burden of CPAF. Current SoC for patients with CPAF is globally heterogeneous and representative of the unmet need for a consistently effective therapeutic approach, with limited existing high-quality evidence and no standardised treatment approach. Only one study from Spain (2009) explored direct costs per patient per year, amounting to €8,289; however, authors and interviewed payers perceived this cost to be potentially under-representative versus current European costs. Interviewees suggest that CPAF treatment would benefit from PBRSAs, although depending on country, different models might be adopted. CONCLUSIONS: here is no standardised SoC in CPAF. Treatment is determined on a patient-by-patient basis, leading to variation in clinical outcomes and costs. Additionally, there is inadequate quantification of medical costs associated with CPAF management. These circumstances generate uncertainty in cost estimation for payers, for lack of consistent comparative figures. Therefore, CPAF treatment represents an excellent candidate for PBRSAs. PBRSAs can enable access to novel therapies with unproven long-term effect.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PGI40

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Risk-sharing Approaches

Disease

Gastrointestinal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×