THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS AND INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIO THRESHOLDS IN THE UNITED STATES CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION’S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (CDC ACIP) VACCINATION RECO ...
Author(s)
Prabhu V1, Schmidt A2, El Mouaddin N3, Samant S4, Roberts CS4, Kothari S4
1Merck & Co. Inc.,, North Wales, PA, USA, 2ICON, Lyon, France, 3ICON, Nanterre, France, 4Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (CDC ACIP) is a group of medical and public health experts responsible for vaccination recommendations in the US. A key criteria in ACIP decision-making is “reasonable and efficient allocation of resources,” typically assessed by a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). The objective was to determine the role of CEA in ACIP decision-making and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) based on which vaccines are likely to be recommended. METHODS: All online meeting minutes for ACIP meetings from 2010-2017 were reviewed. For each meeting, data such as meeting date, population sub-group, basic assumptions, ICERs (various scenarios), and associated recommendation (routine, permissive or no recommendation) were abstracted. A qualitative assessment was made regarding the likelihood of receiving a routine recommendation based on a threshold of $100,000/QALY. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, 47 ICERs were assessed by ACIP, ranging from $1,583/QALY to $5million/QALY, depending on the vaccine and population considered. Assessments targeted Hepatitis B (26% of ICERs), HPV (23%), Meningococcal (15%), Pneumococcal (15%), Tetanus, Diphteria, Pertussis (Tdap) (13%) and Herpes Zoster (11%) vaccines. All routine recommendations for HPV, Pneumococcal and Herpes Zoster vaccines were for use in populations with ICERs below $100,000/QALY. All ICERs above $100,000/QALY had a negative or permissive recommendation. Tdap vaccine strategies showed a wide heterogeneity in ICERs with a threshold around $500,000/QALY. Meningococcal and Hepatitis B proposals had high ICERs (above $100,000/QALY) for the majority of scenarios, however ACIP routinely recommended these vaccination strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccines with ICERs below $100,000/QALY are likely to receive a routine recommendation at the ACIP. Vaccines with ICERs above $100,000/QALY may also be recommended for routine vaccination, based on factors other than cost-effectiveness analysis.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PIN47
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)