SAVING HEALTHCARE AND SOCIETAL COSTS BY CHANGING THE ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION OF ONCOLOGY DRUGS

Author(s)

Franken MG1, Kanters TA1, Coenen JL2, de Jong P3, Koene HR4, Lugtenburg PJ5, Jager A5, Uyl-de Groot CA1
1Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands, 3St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 4St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands, 5Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: Subcutaneous (SC) formulations became recently available for several oncology drugs historically administered intravenously (IV). We investigated healthcare and societal costs of SC and IV administration of two oncology drugs in The Netherlands.

METHODS: Data were collected for the preparation and administration of IV and SC trastuzumab (HER2+ metastatic breast cancer) and rituximab (non-Hodgkin lymphoma) at the hospital pharmacy and oncology daycare unit in six Dutch hospitals. For each patient, we registered healthcare professional time, patient chair time, and use of drugs and disposables. Patients completed questionnaires regarding productivity losses, informal care and travelling expenses. Costs were valued using the Dutch costing manual. Costs for time spent at the daycare were computed using the financial administration of participating hospitals.

RESULTS: A total of 82 patients received trastuzumab (37 IV and 45 SC) and 44 patients received rituximab (23 IV and 21 SC). The largest costs were drug costs (€2000 for IV and €1828 for SC). Costs for one administration (excluding drug costs) were €167 and €264 for IV and €76 and €146 for SC trastuzumab and rituximab, respectively. For both drugs, SC administration resulted in €79 lower healthcare and €26 lower societal costs. The largest costs were owing to time spent at the daycare unit (€96 for IV and €38 for SC). Other savings were related to use of consumables (€12) and time of healthcare professionals (€9). Compared to IV administration, SC administration could generate €11 million savings in The Netherlands (€3.7 million for trastuzumab and €7.3 million for rituximab).

CONCLUSIONS: Compared to oncology drug costs, administration costs are relatively small. Important savings can, however, be generated by switching to SC administration because of the large number of administrations. It is essential to optimize the allocation of scarce resources either by changing the route of administration and/or by switching to less costly biosimilar equivalents.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PCN85

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×