QUIDS IN? – A REVIEW OF WHETHER POTENTIAL BLOCKBUSTER SAVINGS FROM BIOSIMILAR ADALIMUMAB SHOULD BE REINVESTED IN OTHER DISEASE AREAS?

Author(s)

Radu X1, Campbell R2, Martin M2
1Syneos Health Consulting, London, BKM, UK, 2Syneos Health Consulting, London, UK

OBJECTIVES

:
Humira® European patent expires in October 2018. Humira® is an attractive product for biosimilars due to its blockbuster status. It is the highest spend drug in UK NHS hospitals: £250 million in 2015/2016. In 2017, four adalimumab biosimilars were approved by the EMA. The UK has introduced aggressive targets to encourage biosimilar uptake and generate savings. Specialised services have a goal of treating 90% of new patients with best value biologic within 3 months of launch and 80% of existing patients within 12 months. We studied whether it is more beneficial to reinvest adalimumab biosimilar savings to treat additional RA patients or spend it on alternative treatments from a UK payer perspective.

METHODS

:
Firstly, a model estimated the savings from adalimumab biosimilars from a UK NHS perspective. Secondly, five alternative indications were selected based on burden of illness and associated high-cost but high-efficacy treatments: melanoma, hepatitis C (HepC), multiple sclerosis (MS), Duchenne’s disease (MD), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the treatments: ataluren (MD), natalizumab (MS), pembrolizumab (melanoma), crizotinib (NSCLC), and sofosbuvir+ ribavirin (HepC). The model estimated the health gain (expressed as QALYs) that could be obtained from using the adalimumab biosimilar savings to treat patients in the five alternative indications and RA.

RESULTS

:
We estimated savings from adalimumab biosimilar of ~£10 million over five years (2018-2022). We implemented a conservative approach on biosimilar uptake (68% in the third year) and we expect the savings to exceed this mark, up to £14 million (with 92% market share in the third year). Considering the average QALYs gains, biosimilar savings are best spent on Hep C (654) treatments followed by RA (367), MS (300), NSCLC (248), melanoma (85) and MD (17).

CONCLUSIONS

:
Our research highlights that payers should also consider other options to reinvest biosimilar savings in disease areas with high QALY yields.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PSY156

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×