MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT WITH DIRECT PATIENT ENGAGEMENT TO ADDRESS NON-ADHERENCE TO SPECIALTY DRUGS
Author(s)
Feinberg BA1, Burruss RA2, Arikian V3, Jaster R2, Oleru K2, Traurig T2, Merritt N1, Nabhan C1
1Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions, Dublin, OH, USA, 2Cardinal Health Specialty Pharmacy, Columbia, MD, USA, 3SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
Retrospective review of patients on a SD participating in an MTM program who completed a telephone assessment prior to first prescription fill and prior to first prescription refill. The assessment included the following disease/treatment burden (DTB) query: “How are you feeling today?” which patients responded to on a Likert-style, self-rated health scale (1=miserable and 10=wonderful). Mean scores at first fill were compared to mean scores prior to first refill. Adherence was measured using Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (URAC) 3.0 standard - proportion of days covered (PDC).
RESULTS: In 2017 23,186 unique patients with a total of 45,256 prescription fills received for 140 different specialty drugs to treat 355 different chronic diagnoses (e.g., cancer, auto-immune, HIV, pain, psychoses, multiple sclerosis, transplant) were identified. 5,167 patients (22%) had before and after DTB query responses and adherence measures. The mean DTB at first fill was 5.65 and the mean DTB at first refill was 6.86. The mean DTB change from before to after was +1.21 (21.1%); which was a significant improvement (P=0.0211). The PDC at refill was 0.89, representing a non-adherence rate of 11%. CONCLUSIONS: Patient’s sense of well-being and observed drug adherence were significantly better than published data. Whether direct telephone patient engagement contributed to these results warrants further investigation.Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PMU78
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance
Disease
Multiple Diseases