IS THE CHOICE OF WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY THRESHOLD IN COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS ENDOGENOUS TO THE RESULTING VALUE OF THE TECHNOLOGY?
Author(s)
Padula WV1, Chen H2, Phelps CE3
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 3University of Rochester, Gualala, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: We explored whether the selection of a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold in cost-utility analysis (CUA) was endogenous to the economic model output in terms of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). This is based on a concern that CUAs are using higher WTP thresholds to compensate for technology of relatively lower value. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of U.S. economic literature between 2000-2017, including studies with explicit WTP thresholds and ICERs from U.S. perspectives. We classified the ratio of studies hypothesized to analyze cost-effective health technologies at low WTP thresholds (i.e. $50,000/QALY) vs. higher thresholds (i.e. $100,000/QALY or $150,000/QALY) relative to reported ICERs. We analyzed whether technologies that were cost-effective at high WTP thresholds would still be cost-effective at lower thresholds using a chi-square test. RESULTS: Among 317 reported ICERs: 185 (58.4%) were <$50,000/QALY; 53 (16.7%) were between $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY; 20 (6.3%) were between $100,000/QALY and $150,000/QALY; and 59 (18.6%) were > $150,000/QALY. Although most studies referenced a single WTP threshold (75.1%), 13.6% and 11.4 % of the studies reported multiple WTP thresholds and did not reference WTP threshold, respectively. Among those articles referencing a single WTP threshold, 194 reported that both the ICER and referenced WTP threshold were less than or equal to $150,000/QALY. We dichotomized the ICERs and the WTP thresholds into two categories, either between $50,000/QALY–$100,000/QALY or between $100,000/QALY–$150,000/QALY. This approached illustrated that WTP thresholds were not independent of the ICER results (P<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: WTP thresholds represent the hypothesis test for CUA. We shoe an association between a large proportion of CUAs with higher WTP thresholds having greater ICERs, that would otherwise not have been cost-effective at lower standard WTP thresholds. Researchers may select a WTP threshold after the ICER is calculated to infer value that suits their hypothesis.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PRM39
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Multiple Diseases