INFLIXIMAB FOR DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTI-RHEUMATIC DRUG-NAIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS- SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLICATIONS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Author(s)

Zrubka Z, Brodszky V, Péntek M, Rencz F, Gulácsi L
Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

OBJECTIVES: To review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line infliximab treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with a focus on long-term outcomes.

METHODS: The study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE was conducted up to May 25, 2018 for infliximab RCTs in RA using the Cochrane Highly Sensitive search filter. Manuscript eligibility criteria were: (1) full-text manuscript of a RCT, including post-hoc analyses; (2) infliximab treatment arm; and (3) study population of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve RA patients. Efficacy (clinical, patient-reported outcomes, and radiological progression) and key safety endpoints were extracted.

RESULTS: The search result contained 2,679 citations; 1,830 after duplicates were removed. After excluding conference abstracts, reviews, pooled analyses, and non-relevant studies, 7 RCTs (35 publications) were identified: ASPIRE (7 publications), BeSt (16), Durez et al. 2007(1), IDEA (2), NEO-RACo (5), Quinn et al. 2005 (3), and Tam et al. 2012 (1). Sample sizes in the 7 RCTs ranged from 20 to 1,049 patients with follow-up durations between 3 months and 10 years. Results for 64 relevant endpoints at 19 timepoints were reported, resulting in 200 timepoint-outcome combinations. Out of these, 183 (92%) were reported from 1 of the studies, 17 from ≥2 studies, and 11 from ≥3 studies. Results for American College of Rheumatology response, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and 1-year remission rate were reported from 4, 5, and 4 studies, respectively. Beyond 1 year of follow-up, results for these 3 major efficacy endpoints were only reported from 3 studies.

CONCLUSIONS: Reports on first-line infliximab treatment for patients with DMARD-naïve RA are abundant. However, diversity of study design and the reporting of long-term outcomes hampers meta-analyses of the results. These findings support the need for developing guidelines for reporting from long-term studies, in line with cohorts and registries in RA.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PMS3

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×