IMPACT OF VARIATION IN INFLUENZA VACCINATION SCHEDULES AND DECISION-MAKING CRITERIA ON PATIENT OUTCOMES IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Author(s)

Gani R1, Chapman R1, Sutton K1, Feng H2
1Evidera, London, UK, 2Evidera, Waltham, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES

:
Epidemic influenza causes tens of thousands of deaths across Europe each year. Despite widespread population mixing, epidemiology data shows timing and severity of outbreaks differ considerably by country. Whilst a range of vaccines are available in Europe, national vaccination schedules vary due to differences in vaccination policy decision-making criteria. Here we use influenza data to assess the impact of variations in decision-making criteria and schedules on patient outcomes across European countries.

METHODS

:
Epidemic influenza data (from ECDC/WHO Influenza website) and excess mortality data (from EUROMOMO) was gathered for European countries for the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 flu seasons. Assessment methods for selected European countries were reviewed to identify the key decision-making criteria used to develop influenza vaccination policy. Influenza vaccination schedules were also identified. The epidemic and mortality data was correlated with the number and types of decision-making criteria, and characteristics of the vaccination schedules, to evaluate their relationship to patient outcomes.

RESULTS

:
Data was gathered for Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland and the UK. Countries using more decision-making criteria were associated with lower reported incidence of influenza-like-illness (ILI), and countries with the broadest vaccination schedules were found to have lower reported rates of ILI and excess mortality. Comparing incidence in countries that used a criterion against those that didn’t showed that some were associated with higher incidence. These were: feasibility of program implementation, clinical trial results and equity in access to vaccine. Decision-making criteria associated with lower incidence were: disease burden, efficacy and effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

:
Lower burdens of disease were found in countries using a wider range of decision-making criteria to develop vaccination policy compared to countries employing fewer criteria. This supports the use of a broader range of decision-making criteria when developing vaccination policy.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PIN111

Topic

Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×