ECONOMIC VALUE OF NARROW BAND IMAGING VERSUS WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER- COST-CONSEQUENCE MODEL
Author(s)
Ihara Z1, Furneri G2, Haycock L3, Chowdhury CA4, Besser V5
1Olympus Europa, Hamburg, HH, Germany, 2CBPartners, London, UK, 3CBPartners, London, ABD, UK, 4CBPartners, New York, NY, USA, 5Olympus Europa, Hamburg, Germany
OBJECTIVES: Narrow band imaging (NBI) is a technology used for endoscopic diagnosis and support during the treatment of lesions in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). NBI has demonstrated improved sensitivity and specificity compared with white-light imaging (WLI), and is associated with lower cancer recurrence. Through these clinical benefits, NBI has the potential to provide cost-savings vs. WLI due to the associated reductions in healthcare resource utilisation. This analysis quantifies the economic benefit of NBI in NMIBC. METHODS: A cost-consequence analysis was conducted adopting the UK hospital perspective. A cohort of N=100 NMIBC-suspected patients enter the model and receive diagnosis with NBI or WLI cystoscopy. Based on diagnostic accuracy, patients are classified as: true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), or false negative (FN). Patients with a NMIBC diagnosis undergo transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), while patients diagnosed as cancer-free receive standard monitoring. After one year of observation, patients are stratified into three states: i) cancer-free; ii) recurrence; iii) non-diagnosed NMIBC. Patients with recurrence or non-diagnosed NMIBC can progress from non-invasive to invasive bladder cancer. The model considers hospital costs related to equipment, reprocessing, maintenance, consumables / medication, staff, TURBT, recurrence management and disease progression. A micro-costing approach was adopted to calculate cystoscopy costs. RESULTS: NBI reduced the recurrence rate vs. WLI (16.9% vs. 37.4%, respectively), and resulted in cost-savings of £9,046 (overall costs: £170,577 vs. £179,623, respectively). More NIMBC cases were detected with NBI vs. WLI (81 vs. 69 TP cases, respectively), resulting in increased TURBT costs (£19,309; £127,614 vs. £108,305, respectively). However, increased TURBT costs were offset by the reduction of recurrences, which determined cost-savings of £28,355 (£23,282 with NBI; £51,637 with WLI). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that NBI is dominant vs. WLI for detection and support during the treatment of NMIBC in UK hospitals.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PMD65
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology