DISPENSATION DATA ONLY VERSUS LINKED PRESCRIPTION AND DISPENSATION DATA TO CALCULATE REAL-WORLD MEDICATION ADHERENCE- IMPROVING THE ACCURACY OF SECONDARY ADHERENCE MEASURES.
Author(s)
Garcia-Sempere A, Hurtado I, Sanfelix G, Peiro S
FISABIO, VALENCIA, Spain
OBJECTIVES: To compare traditional, dispensation-based estimates of Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) with estimates using linked prescription and dispensation information. We illustrate and quantify their differences by estimating real-world, long-term medication secondary adherence in a population-based cohort of osteoporotic patients in the region of Valencia. METHODS: We provide PDC with only dispensation data in two ways: a) censoring patients only in case of death or loss to follow-up due to disenrollment, where the assessment period (almost) coincides with the follow-up period (“fixed interval”) and b) censoring the assessment periods also at the moment of the last dispensation within the follow-up period ( “last-refill interval” ). We calculated the prescription-adjusted PDC with two different operational definitions: c) considering a minimum prescription gap of three months to adjust PDC (meaning that, when there is a gap of three months or longer in prescription, this period is censored and is not accounted as patient non-adherence), and d) considering any prescription gap (meaning that, when there is any gap in prescription, this period is censored and excluded from the calculation of patient non-adherence). RESULTS: Mean PDC at 12 months for new users was 63.1% using only dispensation data and a fixed interval, 86.0% using only dispensation data and a last-refill interval, 81% using linked dispensation and prescription data censoring any period without prescription, and 78,3% when using linked prescription and dispensation data but censoring when prescription gaps are 3 months and over. For experienced users, figures were 80.0%, 88.9%, 83% and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Linking prescription and dispensation data allows for the accounting of primary and early non-adherence and of physician interruption when estimating PDC, resulting in a refined and more accurate estimation of secondary adherence versus using dispensation only data. This methodological improvement may be useful and applied to every chronic disease where effective medication is available.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PMS86
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders