COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NINTEDANIB FOR THE TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL LUNG CANCER IN PORTUGAL
Author(s)
Almeida J1, Tavares A1, Vandewalle B2, Felix J2, Andreozzi V3, Viana DS4
1Exigo Consultores, Lisboa, Portugal, 2Exigo Consultores, Lisbon, Portugal, 3Exigo Consultores, Lisbon, 11, Portugal, 4Boehringer Ingelheim, Lisboa, Portugal
OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer is the main cause of cancer related deaths worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing approximately 85% of all cases. Nearly 30-40% of NSCLC patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis (mNSCLC). Five-year survival rates for mNSCLC are below 36%. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of nintedanib for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced, metastatic or locally recurrent NSCLC of adenocarcinoma tumour histology after first-line chemotherapy in Portugal. METHODS: A survival model was developed to represent the natural history of NSCLC for a lifetime horizon. Best supportive care (BSC) + docetaxel were set as the comparator. Efficacy and safety were derived from a phase III, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial (LUME-Lung 1) which compared nintedanib+docetaxel to placebo+docetaxel. Parametric survival analyses were performed and best fitting survival function was selected using Akaike's Information Criterion. Costs were derived from public sources. A 5% annual discount rate was adopted for costs and effects. Results were expressed in incremental costs per life year (LY) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). RESULTS: On average, nintedanib + docetaxel is expected to increase mNSCLC undiscounted life expectancy by 0.39 LYs versus BSC + docetaxel (21.7 versus CONCLUSIONS: In the 2nd mNSCLC line setting, nintedanib is expected to provide a clinically meaningful life expectancy increase at an incremental cost per life year gained within an acceptable range.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PCN145
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology