COST EFFECTIVENESS OF LETERMOVIR AS PROPHYLAXIS OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CYTOMEGALOVIRUS REACTIVATION AND DISEASE IN ADULT CMV-SEROPOSITIVE ALLOGENEIC HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT- AN ENGLISH PAYER PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Brown C1, Mayes A1, Schelfhout J2, Jiang Y3, Glover M4, Taymor E1
1Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd, Hoddesdon, UK, 2Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA., New Jersey, NY, USA, 3Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd., Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire, UK, 4PHMR Ltd, London, UK

OBJECTIVES

:
Data from a recent clinical trial (PN001) has demonstrated the efficacy of letermovir as prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease in adult CMV-seropositive recipients [R+] of an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The objective of this cost-effectiveness analysis is to evaluate the clinical and economic value of letermovir compared to pre-emptive treatment from the payer perspective in England.

METHODS

:
A decision-analytic model evaluated total costs and lifetime QALYs from the perspective of the NHS and personal and social services in England. Efficacy data included in the model were incorporated from PN001 at the time of primary endpoint assessment (24 weeks post-transplant). Costs of trial outcomes were obtained from published sources. Life-years were estimated from mortality observed in the clinical trial and were estimated for the week 24 survivors by applying a relative risk of death to the general population. Utility values were based on EQ-5D data. The annual cost to treat 1-year survivors was based on a proportion of patients receiving treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Sensitivity analysis explored the impact of including data from the extended follow-up period (48 weeks post-transplant). The model used an annual discount rate of 3.5%.

RESULTS

:
In the base-case analysis, letermovir reduced the number of CMV infections requiring pre-emptive treatment vs standard of care (SoC) (20.0% vs 49.3%) at 24 weeks post-transplant. Letermovir prophylaxis resulted in lower all-cause mortality at week 24 in comparison to SoC (10.2% vs. 15.9%), and a mean increase in QALYs (+0.46) and total costs per patient. Results of a probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that letermovir was cost effective in 81.9% of iterations at £20,000 per QALY gained and 89.5% of iterations at £30,000 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

:
The results of this model suggest that CMV prophylaxis with letermovir is a cost-effective strategy at commonly accepted ICER thresholds.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PSY93

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Rare and Orphan Diseases, Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×