COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ATEZOLIZUMAB COMPARED TO TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR ADULT PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) AFTER PRIOR CHEMOTHERAPY - UPDATED RESULTS
Author(s)
Kourkoulas N1, Athanasakis K1, Kakouros M2, Skroumpelos A3, Kyriopoulos J1
1National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece, 2Roche Hellas S.A., Maroussi, A1, Greece, 3Roche Hellas S.A., Athens, Greece
OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer poses a high disease and economic burden on healthcare systems globally. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases. Atezolizumab antibody provides inhibitory signals to PD-L1 in order to restore T cells activity. Through the immune checkpoint inhibition Atezolizumab stimulates an anti-tumour response in NSCLC patients. The objective of this analysis was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of Atezolizumab versus the standard of care for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after prior chemotherapy, in Greece. METHODS: A three state partitioned survival model was developed for the cost-effectiveness analysis of Atezolizumab vs Docetaxel, Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab. The model was populated with clinical effectiveness data from the literature. Greek-specific data on real-world resource use was sourced from an expert panel of 10 oncologists. Hospital prices were used for all drugs. The analysis followed a third party payer perspective. RESULTS: Atezolizumab offers incremental gains compared to Docetaxel (0.84 LY and 0.59 QALYs), Nivolumab (0.06 LY and 0.01 QALYs) and Pembrolizumab (0.09 LY and 0.06 QALYs). Additional total costs of €43,465 and €810 are introduced with Atezolizumab compared to Docetaxel and Pembrolizumab, whereas a reduction of €11,924 in total costs compared to Nivolumab. Atezolizumab can be considered as a cost-effective (dominant) option for the treatment of NSCLC compared to NIvolumab, and results in an ICER of 51,744/LY gained and 73,669/QALY gained compared to Docetaxel and an ICER of 9,000/LY gained and 13,500/QALY gained compared to Pembrolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the analysis suggest that the use of anti-PD-L1 Atezolizumab, as 2nd line treatment of NSCLC patients, offers gains in LY and QALY’s compared to existing treatment options. Atezolizumab provides health gains either at a lower cost (vs Nivolumab) or at an added cost below the acceptable threshold (vs Docetaxel and Pembrolizumab).
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
PCN148
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology, Respiratory-Related Disorders