CHOOSING VIDEO INSTEAD OF IN-CLINIC CONSULTATIONS IN PRIMARY CARE- DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT AMONG KEY STAKEHOLDERS- PATIENTS, PRIMARY CARE PRACTITIONERS AND POLICY MAKERS.

Author(s)

Chudner I1, Drach-Zahavi A2, Karkabi K3
1Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Rishon LeZion, Israel, 2Haifa University, Haifa, Israel, 3Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

OBJECTIVES

:
Despite being beneficial for Primary care settings, the adoption of Video-Consultations (VC) instead of traditional in-clinic consultations (I-CCs) is complex and slow. Understanding VC vs. ICC choice' related preferences of the three key stakeholder groups in primary care: Patients, Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) and Policy Makers (PMs), is crucial for achieving better implementation.

METHODS

:
Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) surveys with 12 choice tasks of two labeled alternatives (VC or I-CC) with four VC vs. ICC attributes most relevant to each stakeholder group was filled by 508 Patients, 264 PCPs and 138 PMs. Choice' attributes were, for both patients and PMs were: (1)-Time to next available appointment; (2)-Time in-line before consultation; (3)-Relationship to PCP; and (4)-Quality of consultation. For PCPs these were: (1)-Time in-line before consultation; (2)-Patient's self-management ability; (3)-Consultation purpose; (4)-Quality of consultation. Random effects logit model analysis was used to estimate stakeholders' preferences for attributes.

RESULTS

:
All experiment attributes were significantly important in choosing VC vs. ICC for patients and PCPs groups. Three out of four attributes were significantly important for PMs. Gaps and similarities were identified between stakeholders in attribute rank orders, trade-offs and probabilities of VC take up. PMs VC uptake were 86%, patients’ preferences suggested that 68% of ICC can be switched to VC and PCPs uptake rates were 30% in cases, where consultation purpose is to diagnose and giving treatment and 48% of consultations, where consultation purpose is follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

:
Our findings show key stakeholders' preferences for VC integration. Those preferences should be considered when VC systems are about to be used in primary care to optimize implementation process. Although there is a stronger preference for I-CC among PCPs and patients, alternative combinations of attribute levels can be used to compensate and reconfigure a more preferred VC service.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PMU106

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×