ARE PATIENT-REPORTED PERSISTENCE AND ADHERENCE TO TREATMENT FOR A CHRONIC DISEASE VALID OUTCOMES? AN EXAMPLE WITH OSTEOPOROSIS
Author(s)
Senay A1, Perreault S1, Delisle J2, Morin SN3, Banica A2, Laflamme Y2, Leduc S2, Mac-Thiong J2, Ranger P2, Rouleau D2, Fernandes JC2
1University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
OBJECTIVES: To compare persistence and adherence to osteoporosis therapy as reported by patients against the same parameters measured through administrative healthcare data. METHODS: Patient-reported persistence and adherence to oral osteoporosis therapy were obtained from a Fracture Liaison Service managing patients with a recent fracture during follow-up visits (3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months). Data were collected for 2 years and both parameters were dichotomized (yes/no). Pharmacy data was also retrieved for the period. Patients were categorized as persistent to therapy if a claim was present in the 40 days preceding visits. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) over the period between initiation in the last month before the visit up to the visit date. A PDC >
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
AD4
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders
Your browser is out-of-date
ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now