A NEW FRENCH FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO BOOST INSULIN AND ETANERCEPT BIOSIMILARS PRESCRIBING- SIMULATION OF ECONOMIC IMPACTS FOR THE PUBLIC HOSPITALS OF PARIS

Author(s)

Ade A1, Degrassat-Théas A2, Bocquet F2, Parent de Curzon O3, Paubel P2
1Faculty of pharmacy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France, 2General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) ; Law and Health Economics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy & Health Law Institute (INSERM UMR S1145) Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France, 3Pharmacy department, General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France

OBJECTIVES:

Incentives policies applied to biosimilars are heterogenous across European countries. In France, a financial incentive applies from 1st January 2018 to reward hospitals increasing prescribing rate for etanercept and insulin biosimilars dispensed in community pharmacies. This study assesses the potential cost savings and the amount of the financial incentive for different prescribing scenarios of etanercept and insulin biosimilars for the 39 Public Hospitals of Paris (AP-HP).

METHODS:

To perform the economic simulation, community pharmacy dispensing data for drugs prescribed in AP-HP in 2016 were retrieved from the open access database “Open PHMEV” (prescribing hospital, ATC classification, amount of dispensed drugs, reimbursed amount). Cost savings= [branded drug public price – biosimilar public price] X biosimilar uptake X amount of dispensed drugs; financial incentive = 20% X [branded drug public price – biosimilar public price] X biosimilar uptake X amount of dispensed drugs. Four scenarios of the biosimilar uptake were tested: 80% (French national objective 2018-2022), 70%, 50% and 40%.

RESULTS:

Dispensing data were originated from prescription of 36 AP-HP hospitals (92%). A total of 23,740 boxes of branded and biosimilar etanercept and 108,716 boxes of branded and biosimilar insulin were respectively prescribed by 21 and 36 AP-HP hospitals. With a biosimilar uptake level of 80%, cost savings were estimated to 2,801,666€ and 749,725€ respectively for etanercept and insulin biosimilars. The total amount of financial incentive was estimated to 711,185€: 80% for etanercept biosimilar (559,090€) and 20% for insulin biosimilar (152,095€).

CONCLUSIONS:

Priority actions need to be directed towards prescribing etanercept biosimilar because cost savings are higher, and the market is concentrated on a small number of hospitals. Cost savings were underestimated because prescription refills in community pharmacies were excluded. This financial incentive could be an interesting driver to increase prescribing rates of biosimilars, but education remains the cornerstone to improve biosimilar uptake.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)

Code

PHP72

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Pricing Policy & Schemes

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×