A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF MULITI-GENE PHARMACOGENETIC TESTING IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME PATIENTS FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
Author(s)
Dong O1, Lee CR1, Wheeler SB2, Voora D3, Dusetzina SB4, Wiltshire T1
1Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 3Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA, 4Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of multi-gene pharmacogenetic testing (CYP2C19, SLCO1B1, CYP2C9/VKORC1) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to single gene testing (CYP2C19) and usual care (no genotyping) from the perspective of Medicare. METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to simulate the medical costs (2018 US$) and outcomes over a time horizon of 27 months for a hypothetical closed cohort of ACS patients undergoing PCI requiring antiplatelet (CYP2C19 to guide clopidogrel or prasugrel/ticagrelor selection), statin therapy (SLCO1B1 to guide simvastatin or alternative statin selection), and anticoagulant therapy in those that develop atrial fibrillation (CYP2C9/VKORC1 to guide warfarin dose). Outcomes included myalgia/myopathy, stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleed, thromboembolic events, deaths, and cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Model input estimates were from published data. Cost and QALYs were discounted at 3%. Base-case scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations were completed. RESULTS: Base-case scenario results indicated the discounted cost per QALY gained was $23,165 and $27,415 for multi-gene testing and single-gene testing, respectively, when compared to usual care. Both genotyping strategies resulted in fewer adverse outcomes when compared to usual care with more myalgia/myopathy, major bleeds, and thromboembolic events avoided on multi-gene testing when compared to single-gene testing. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that 100% of simulations were below the $50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold for both genotyping strategies when compared to usual care. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing multi-gene or single-gene pharmacogenetic test for ACS patients undergoing PCI is cost-effective that could help optimize medication prescribing and avoid adverse outcomes when compared to usual care. Multi-gene testing appeared to be the most cost-effective strategy. Reimbursement for multi-gene pharmacogenetic testing may be a cost-effective investment from the perspective of Medicare to help health systems optimize medication prescribing and achieve better patient outcomes following PCI.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-11, ISPOR Europe 2018, Barcelona, Spain
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S3 (October 2018)
Code
CV1
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Reimbursement & Access Policy, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders