THE IMPACT OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION AND CERVICAL CANCER ON HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE- A REVIEW OF VALIDATED INSTRUMENTS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE

Author(s)

Hugo De Vuyst, MD, Epidemiologist1, Diana Rofail, BSc, (Hons), MSc, Senior Research Associate2, Linda Abetz, BA, MA, Director3, David Jenkins, MD, Director STD Team1, Lisa Lindsay, PhD, Epidemiologist11GSK Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium; 2 Mapi Values Limited, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom; 3 Mapi Values Limited, Bollington, Cheshire, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: To identify the most appropriate instruments which could be used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on the full-spectrum of human papillomavirus (HPV) related cervical disease, namely HPV infection, cervical screening, pre-cancer and cancer. METHODS: Electronic databases (PsycINFO, EMBASE, and PUBMED), the internet, and conference proceeding abstracts were searched. The impact of the health states on HRQoL domains was documented and each instrument was reviewed according to its domain coverage, assessment features, and psychometric properties. RESULTS: The search strategy produced 1011 articles. Of these 94 reported HRQoL data, of which 53 used multidimensional HRQoL instruments. Results indicated that HPV infection, screening, cervical precancer and cancer have a direct and sizeable effect on HRQoL, although not all domains were impacted per health state. Overall, 24 different instruments were identified and categorised as follows: generic (8), illness-specific (2), cancer specific (5), psychosocial (5), or screening instruments (4). A review of the instruments suggest that the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)would be most appropriate generic HRQoL instrument which could be used in any health state, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) would be the most suitable HRQoL cancer-specific instrument in cervical cancer. Either the Psychosocial Effects of Abnormal Pap Smears Questionnaire (PEAPS-Q) or the Cervical Dysplasia Distress Questionnaire (CDDQ) could be used to assess psychosocial impact in cervical dysplasia, and either the Quality of Life for Population Screening (SCREENQOL) or the Self-Evaluation Quality of Life Questionnaire (SEQOL) could be used as a screening instrument. CONCLUSIONS: There was no single instrument that covered all the domains that would be directly relevant to each health state. Thus, our recommendation is that when possible a battery of instruments including one from each category identified should be administered in any study.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2006-05, ISPOR 2006, Philadelphia, PA

Value in Health, Vol. 9, No.3 (May/June 2006)

Code

PCN40

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×