THE COST OF ANTICOAGULATION MONITORING SERVICES IN THE UK NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE

Author(s)

Arya R1, Green ES2, Rose P3, Dolan G4, Wimperis JZ5, Tait RC6, Plumb J7, Emmas C71Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 2 Swindon and Marlborough NHS Trust, Swindon, Wiltshire, United Kingdom; 3 University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Warwick, Warwickshire, United Kingdom; 4 University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Notts, United Kingdom; 5 Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom; 6 Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; 7 AstraZeneca UK, Luton, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: To establish the current level of resource utilisation required to monitor International Normalised Ratio (INR) levels in patients treated with warfarin in the UK National Health Service. METHODS: Monitoring services in areas associated with six secondary care Trusts were studied. Accurate descriptions of services were obtained through one-to-one semi-structured interviews with NHS staff involved in the delivery of anticoagulant monitoring. Due to the complexity of the different systems, where possible, resource use was divided into the 3 main steps: taking blood (including transport of patients and/or bloods), INR analysis, and the communication of results and warfarin dose changes. Costs associated with running the service were identified and sourced from local settings or NHS reference costs as appropriate (2004 prices). RESULTS: The six monitoring services were responsible for an average of 3,459 (Range 1,422-4,500) warfarin patients, with a mean frequency of INR monitoring of 14.2 times per year (SD 3.4). The average cost of a monitoring visit was £14.58 (SD 4.25), of which £6.88 as associated with taking bloods, £4.08 with analysis and £3.62 with communication of results and dose changes. The mean annual cost per patient of INR monitoring was £206.41 (SD 63.51). Three of the services had separate hospital and primary/shared care models of INR monitoring. In these services the cost per INR test tended to be lower in the hospital based model (Mean £13.39) than in models that included primary care (Mean £23.06). CONCLUSIONS: The cost of INR monitoring varies according to setting and system. Where monitoring involves primary care, it tends to be more costly than systems in which hospital anticoagulation clinics control monitoring and warfarin treatment. This may be due to economies of scale and the ability of specialist clinics to deal with the monitoring process more efficiently.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2005-11, ISPOR Europe 2005, Florence, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 8, No.6 (November/December 2005)

Code

PCV14

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×