COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF LETROZOLE VERSUS TAMOXIFEN AS INITIAL ADJUVANT THERAPY IN HORMONE-RECEPTOR POSITIVE POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH EARLY BREAST CANCER IN THE UK

Author(s)

Karnon J1, Delea TE2, Papo NL3, Barghout V4, Thomas SK5, Johnston SR61University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; 2 Policy Analysis Inc, Brookline, MA, USA; 3 Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, Camberley, United Kingdom; 4 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Florham Park, NJ, USA; 5 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA; 6 Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: The primary core analysis of the BIG 1-98 study showed that in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) early breast cancer, the aromatase inhibitor (AI) letrozole (LET) significantly reduced the risk of recurrence by 19% overall (95% CI 7-30%) and the risk of relapse in distant sites by 27% overall (CI 12-40%) compared with tamoxifen (TAM). Letrozole demonstrated non-significant improvements in overall survival and contralateral breast cancer. LET patients had reduced risks of endometrial cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE), but increased risks of mild/moderate hypercholesteraemia, cardiac events and fractures. This study reports the cost-effectiveness of initial adjuvant therapy with LET vs TAM in postmenopausal women with HR+ early stage breast cancer from the UK NHS perspective based on preliminary analyses of published results of the BIG 1-98 trial. METHODS: A Markov model describes the occurrence of contralateral tumours; locoregional recurrence; soft tissue, bone, and visceral metastases, and treatment side effects (endometrial cancer, VTE, hip fractures, other fractures, hypercholesterolaemia, and MI). Clinical parameters for TAM were based on published results of the BIG 1-98 trial and other published studies, as were health-state utilities. Corresponding probabilities for LET were calculated by applying RRs for LET vs TAM from the BIG 1-98 study. Costs of breast-cancer care were estimated using UK patient-level resource use data. Lifetime costs (2004UK£) and QALYs were estimated for HR+ women aged 61 years at diagnosis, discounted at 3.5% annually. RESULTS: Compared with TAM, LET results in an additional 0.33 QALYs (12.84 vs 12.51). These benefits are obtained at an additional cost of £4,079 (£12,474 vs £8,395). Cost-effectiveness of LET vs TAM is £12,321 (95% CI £2,672-£23,889) per QALY saved. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant treatment with letrozole is cost-effective from a UK NHS perspective compared with tamoxifen and should be considered in women diagnosed with HR+ early breast cancer.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2005-11, ISPOR Europe 2005, Florence, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 8, No.6 (November/December 2005)

Code

PCN32

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×