ECONOMIC BURDEN OF ERYTHROPOIESIS STIMULATING AGENT (ESA) TO THE MEDICARE SYSTEM POST PART D
Author(s)
Ko A1, Li M2, Reeder G3, Lu K1
1University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, columbia, SC, USA, 2University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA, 3Kennedy Pharmacy Innovation Center, University of South Carolina, columbia, SC, USA
OBJECTIVES: Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) are be used treat anemia in cancer patients. No study, to date, has explored the economic burden of ESAs in the Medicare Part D population with cancer. Our project aims to fill this literature gap by examining health care costs associated with ESA use among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer post Medicare Part D. METHODS: This study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. We used a retrospective incident user cohort design in SEER-Medicare between 2008 and 2010. Cancer patients with anemia who were enrolled in Medicare Part D were included. Patients with disabilities, end state renal disease (ESRD) and facility dwelling were excluded. A generalized linear model with a log link and gamma distribution was implemented to estimate the economic burden associated with ESAs. RESULTS: A total of 4,490 cancer patients who used ESAs were identified during the study period. The average total direct medical cost for ESA users was $55,850.92 (SD=$40,494.11) compared to $55,219.84 for ESA non-users (SD=$58,325.85). Anemia-related costs among ESA users were $7,843.67 (SD=12,544.48) compared to $9,282.03 for ESA non-users, (SD=$14,599.46). CONCLUSIONS: ESAs use is associated with slightly higher costs for the Medicare Part D program compared to the costs for non-users. However, ESA use was associated with lower total anemia-related costs suggesting an economic benefit for Part D Medicare ESA users.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2018, Tokyo, Japan
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S2 (September 2018)
Code
PSY8
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology, Systemic Disorders/Conditions