COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SERTRALINE VS CITALOPRAM AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER

Author(s)

Imani A1, Alizad L2, Kazerooni SA2, Golestani M1
1Tabriz university of medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran (Islamic Republic of), 2University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran (Islamic Republic of)

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of Sertraline vs citalopram for first-line treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in Bozorgmehr clinic in Tabriz.

METHODS: A two-path decision analytical model with a 6-month horizon was used. All patients (baseline scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HRSD],>9->30) started at primary path, and were referred to specialist care in next path. Model inputs included the following: probabilities from a pragmatic trial performed in Bozorgmehr Clinic in Tabriz, the list of drug prices taken from drug information Pharmacy faculty of Tabriz and costs include indirect and direct costs. Main outcome measures were success (i.e., remission [defined as any decrease in (HAMD)] and costs of treatment (i.e. drug costs and medical care) analyses were performed from the perspectives of the society. Monetary values are reported in year-2015 Rial ($1≈29104IR).

RESULTS: The expected success rate was 37.61 %( 90%CI, 37.61-37.61) for sertraline compared with 50.53 %( 90%CI, 37.61-51.14) for citalopram. From the societal perspective, the expected cost per patient was 101.80(90% CI,13.50-132.93) $ for sertraline compared with 101.4(90% CI ,26.93-142.208)$ for citalopram and incremental cost which provided difference of each drug’s treatment from dominant strategy’s cost was sertraline, and citalopram (0,0.36) as well as incremental effectiveness for sertraline and citalopram was (0, 12.82) respectively so incremental cost-effectiveness provided 0.028 dollars.

CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, the treatment of MDD with sertraline appeared to be a cost-effective alternative compared with citalopram leading to better clinical outcomes and cost savings compared with citalopram in the model used. The success rate of citalopram is higher but its costs is more and if we want to achieve an additional unit of effectiveness of citalopram comparing to sertraline we should spend 0.028 dollars more.

Keywords: Major Depression Disorder (MDD), Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA), citalopram, sertraline.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2018, Tokyo, Japan

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S2 (September 2018)

Code

PMH17

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×