COST ANALYSIS OF CHANGING A MODEL OF CARE AND EMPLOYING GENERAL PRACTITIONERS WITHIN RESIDENTIAL AGED CARE FACILITIES BASED ON A PROSPECTIVE, STEPPED-WEDGE, CLUSTER RANDOMISED TRIAL IN AN AUSTRALIAN SETTING

Author(s)

Palmer AJ1, Si L1, Haines T2, Tierney P3, Robinson A1
1University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, 2Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 3Bupa Aged Care Australia, Sydney, Australia

OBJECTIVES

:
A recent randomised controlled trial in 15 Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) investigated the impact of employment of GPs as staff members within RACFs, appointment of a clinical manager to complement the GP, and re-allocation of registered nurse roles. The GP presence reduced the rate of unplanned hospitalisations by ~50%, reduced admissions to hospital and length of stay and out-of-hours calls, but increased rates of falls, infections and medication errors. The impacts of this change in model of care on costs to the aged care provider (ACP) and state and federal governments have not yet been investigated

METHODS

:
All financial data from the ACP for every RACF involved, before and after implementation of the new model were obtained. Costs of hospital transfers, admissions, ambulance usage and GP consultations were calculated. Costs of new infrastructure, recruiting and training new staff were accounted for. Costs were standardized to 2016 Australian Dollars per occupied bed day (OBD).

RESULTS

:
Implementation of the new model of care resulted in overall cost savings of $9.2/OBD to the ACP, with increased salary costs offset by increased federal government subsidies and Medicare claims income. Costs to federal government increased by $18.5/OBD, driven by increases in subsides. Costs savings of $2.8/OBD to state governments were seen, driven by decreased costs of hospital transfers.

CONCLUSIONS

:
Implementation of a model of care including GPs employed at RACFs had a mixed impact on costs depending on perspective, with overall savings to the ACP and state government, but additional costs to the federal government.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2018, Tokyo, Japan

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S2 (September 2018)

Code

PIH5

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Geriatrics, Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×