TWO NEW CANCER-SPECIFIC MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY INSTRUMENTS- EORTC QLU-C10D AND FACT-8D

Author(s)

King MT1, Norman R2, Viney R3, Costa D1, Brazier J4, Cella D5, Gamper E6, Kemmler G7, McTaggart-Cowan H8, Peacock S8, Pickard AS9, Rowen D4, Young TA4
1University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 2Curtin University, Perth, Australia, 3University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 4University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 5Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA, 6Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, 7Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck, Austria, 8Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 9University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

OBJECTIVES: To develop multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) based on two widely used cancer-specific quality of life (QOL) instruments, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G. METHODS: To determine the health state classification systems (HSCSs) for the two MAUIs, we conducted secondary analyses on pooled data from international sources (QLQ-C30, n=2616; FACT-G, n=6912), using established criteria to select a subset of dimensions and items for the HSCSs. These were then valued using discrete choice experiments (DCEs) administered to population-based online panels in Australia (QLU-C10D and FACT-8D), Germany and France (QLU-C10D), with quota-sampling to achieve representativeness by age and sex.  Conditional logit models, allowing for intra-individual correlation, were estimated to generate country-specific value sets.  RESULTS: Based on a suite of psychometric analyses and input from our multidisciplinary research team, HSCSs were devised for the QLQ-C30 (QLU-C10D, 10 dimensions: long/short walk, work limitations, depression, family/social, tiredness, nausea/vomiting, pain, sleep, appetite, constipation/diarrhoea) and the FACT-G (FACT-8D, 8 dimensions: nausea, pain, fatigue, sleep, work, worry condition will get worse, sad, family support). Four valuation surveys have been conducted in Australia (QLU-C10D, n=1791 and FACT-8D n=1471), Germany (QLU-C10D, n= 1000) and France (QLU-C10D, n=1000).  The results generally reflect the intended monotonic structure, extra years of life are viewed favourably, and movements away from no problems in each dimension are generally valued negatively.  Results across countries are generally similar, but different enough to warrant country-specific value sets. CONCLUSIONS: An advantage of adapting existing QOL instruments into MAUIs is that this reduces patient burden prospectively and allows retrospective conduct of cost-utility analysis, based on previously collected QLQ-C30 or FACT-G data. These two new MAUIs allow direct valuation from widely used cancer-specific QOL instruments, and may be able to capture health states that are uniquely important in oncology – an assertion that must now be tested in head-to-head comparisons with generic MAUIs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2016, Singapore

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

CA1

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health State Utilities

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×