DESIGNING A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT TO MEASURE PATIENT PREFERENCES AND WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY FOR TARGETED THERAPIES FOR COLORECTAL CANCER IN SINGAPORE

Author(s)

Wong XY1, Chia JW2, Chew MH3, Tan WS3, Wee HL1
1National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 2National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 3Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

OBJECTIVES: Molecularly targeted therapies such as cetuximab and bevacizumab have improved survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) significantly. Understanding patient preferences for these treatments as well as their willingness-to-pay is crucial in shared decision making. Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) is increasingly used in healthcare to elicit preferences as it can simulate real-world trade-offs between attributes. This study aims to design a DCE to measure patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for targeted therapies for mCRC. METHODS: In stage 1, literature review and patient interviews were conducted to identify and define important attributes and levels. In stage 2, a draft DCE questionnaire designed based on patients’ feedback was pilot-tested. Patients with stages 2 to 3 CRC were asked to choose one out of two hypothetical drug alternatives, in each of the five choice tasks in the questionnaire. Feedback on pictorial representation, labelling and framing of attributes and dual-response none option were solicited.  RESULTS: In Stage 1 (n=6), all except one chose progression-free-survival as being more important than overall survival. All except two preferred full description of severity of skin rashes over mere labelling as “mild”, “moderate” and “severe”. In Stage 2, 13 patients completed the draft questionnaire, comprising six attributes (progression-free survival, severity of acne-like skin rashes, severity of bleeding, out-of-pocket cost, frequency of administration and degree of independence in medical decision making) with varying attribute levels (2 to 4 levels). Patients prefer out-of-pocket cost to be presented as total cost over treatment lifetime rather than cost-per-month without a defined duration. Patients seemed to have difficulty answering the dual-response none (“Will you really buy the medication you have chosen? Yes or No?”) option.  CONCLUSIONS: Initial lack of clarity in the DCE questionnaire was overcome. Patients were able to complete the choice tasks with little help. A full-scale study is currently in progress.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2016, Singapore

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PCN43

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×