COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SAXAGLIPTIN VERSUS ACARBOSE AS SECOND-LINE THERAPY IN TYPE 2 DIABETES IN CHINA
Author(s)
Gu S1, Zeng Y1, Yu D2, Hu X1, Dong H1
1Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
Presentation Documents
METHODS: Systematic literature reviews were performed to identify studies directly comparing SAXA+MET versus ACAR+MET, and to obtain diabetes-related events costs which was modified by hospital surveys. Cardiff Diabetes Model was used to estimate long-term economic and health treatment consequences in patients. Costs (2014 Chinese yuan) were calculated from the payer’s perspective and estimated over a patient’s lifetime.
RESULTS: SAXA+MET predicted lower incidences of macrovascular and microvascular events, hypoglycemia events and fatal macrovascular events, and decreased total costs compared with ACAR+MET. For an individual patient, the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained with SAXA+MET was 0.06 more than ACAR+MET at an incremental cost saving of ¥149, which resulted in a cost saving of ¥2,536/QALY gained for SAXA+MET versus ACAR+MET. Results were robust across various univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: SAXA+MET is a cost-effective treatment alternative compared with ACAR+MET for patients with T2DM in China, with greater effectiveness and lower costs. SAXA is an effective, well-tolerated drug with a low incidence of adverse events and ease of administration; it is anticipated to be an effective second-line therapy for T2DM treatment.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)
Code
PDB22
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders