AN UPDATED COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SYNFLORIX UNIVERSAL MASS VACCINATION IMPLEMENTATION IN NEW ZEALAND

Author(s)

Varghese L1, Talbot L2, Govender A2, Mungall B1
1GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Singapore, Singapore, 2GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Auckland, New Zealand

OBJECTIVES: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) has reduced significantly following the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) into the routine national childhood vaccination schedule in New Zealand. However, children continue to suffer from non-invasive pneumococcal diseases, including pneumonia and acute otitis media (AOM), which constitute a large clinical and economic burden. Recent evidence has demonstrated cross-protection for the pneumococcal non-typable Haemophilus influenzae protein-D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV; Synflorix™, GSK Vaccines) against invasive disease caused by pneumococcal serotypes 6A and 19A. This study incorporates this recent evidence to compare the cost-effectiveness of PHiD-CV against PCV13 (Prevenar 13™, Wyeth) in a New Zealand birth-cohort.  METHODS: A static Markov cohort model was developed to compare accumulated cost and health benefits of using a 3+1 schedule for PHiD-CV versus PCV13 for a single birth cohort followed over a lifetime. Estimates for model parameters were obtained from locally available databases and published literature. Incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed assuming price-parity. A 2+1 schedule for PHiD-CV was also compared to the 3+1 schedule for PCV13 in a scenario analysis. RESULTS: In the base-case 3+1 scenario, PHiD-CV dominated PCV13 by saving New Zealand dollars (NZD) 0.935M in direct costs and 15.8 QALYs. The estimated impact of PHiD-CV and PCV13 was similar for IPD and all-cause pneumonia, but PHiD-CV was projected to have a greater impact on AOM-related outcomes, including myringotomy procedures performed. Nearly 80% of the prevented AOM-related cases were estimated to be accumulated within the first 48 months. A 2+1 schedule for PHiD-CV would result in a cost-saving of nearly NZD 5 million from a single vaccinated cohort compared to a 3+1 schedule for PCV13. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PCV13, PHiD-CV is projected to be cost-saving from a healthcare provider perspective, offering similar levels of protection against IPD and all-cause pneumonia and higher levels of protection against AOM-related cases.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2016, Singapore

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

IN2

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×