THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF OPTIMIZING THERAPY IN ‘HARD-TO-TREAT’ AND ‘HARDER-TO-TREAT’ HYPOTHYROID PATIENTS BY CHANGING THE LEVOTHYROXINE FORMULATION FROM TABLETS TO GEL CAPS

Author(s)

Carter C1, Elmor R2, Sandulli W3
1CPHS, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, USA, 2Indegene, Inc, Kennesaw, GA, USA, 3Akrimax Pharmaceutical, LLC, Cranford, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES:: To determine the budget impact of incorporating a levothyroxine gel cap formulation in the treatment of patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism that require dose changes secondary to gastrointestinal disease, suboptimal absorption, or tolerability issues with tablet formulations. METHODS::  Costs of levothyroxine formulations (tablets/gel caps; branded/generic) were obtained. Estimated utilization patterns/costs of physician services, laboratory, ancillary services, and lost productivity were based on published literature and governmental/public sources. The projected population was based on epidemiology reports and estimates from the 2014 American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American Thyroid Association Guidelines for the Treatment of Hypothyroidism. MS Excel was used to construct the model and generate outputs. RESULTS::  For every 500,000 persons, there were 23,000 (4.6%) hypothyroid patients of which 17,480 (76.0%) received levothyroxine. The proportion of patients requiring ≥1 dosage changes annually [‘hard-to-treat’ patients] was 31.4% (n=5,489). Similarly, the proportion requiring ≥2 dosage changes annually [‘harder-to-treat’] patients was 8.0% (n=1,398). Using evidenced-based data of the tolerability/absorption of levothyroxine gel caps and converting 20.0% of ‘hard-to-treat’ patients to this formulation produced an annual net cost savings of 294,045 (US$) in direct medical costs and 1,708,684 (US$) in lost productivity. Converting 20.0% of ‘harder-to-treat patients,’ produced an annual net cost savings of 74,916 (US$) in direct medical costs and 435,334 (US$) in lost productivity. The component reduction in direct medical costs was 15.8% for emergency visits, 15.2% for hospitalizations, 6.9% for laboratory, 6.1% for office visits, and 2.7% for specialist visits. The net savings included additional drug costs of the gel cap formulation of 1,288,809 (US$) in the ‘hard-to-treat’ scenario and 328,359 (US$) in the ‘harder-to-treat’ scenario. CONCLUSIONS:: Hypothyroidism can be adequately treated with a consistent daily dose of levothyroxine. However, the need for dose adjustment does occur amongst certain patients. For patients requiring ≥1 dosage changes annually, consideration of switching from tablet to gel cap formulation is warranted.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-09, ISPOR Latin America 2017, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PDB6

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×