SECUKINUMAB SHOWS GREATER SYMPTOMATIC IMPROVEMENT VERSUS ETANERCEPT IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS- COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS UP TO 24 WEEKS ASSESSED BY MATCHING-ADJUSTED INDIRECT COMPARISON

Author(s)

Mease P1, Choy E2, Thom H3, Kalyvas C4, Lopes N5, Pricop L6, Gandhi K6, Jugl SM7, Nash P8
1Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK, 3University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 4Mapi Group, Houten, The Netherlands, 5Novartis Biociências SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 6Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA, 7Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 8University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

OBJECTIVES:

:
When populations across different trials are heterogeneous, Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC) can be used to assess comparative effectiveness; it is supported by NICE DSU methodological guidance.

The objective of this MAIC was to assess the comparative effectiveness of secukinumab 150mg (SEC; fully human anti-interleukin-17A) and etanercept 25mg twice weekly (ETN; tumor necrosis factor inhibitor [TNFi]) up to 24 weeks in biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS:

:
In this MAIC, individual patient data from the pooled SEC arms of FUTURE 1 (F1) and FUTURE 2 (F2; n=302) were weighted to match baseline characteristics of the ETN arm of NCT00317499 (n=101); placebo arms were also matched. Before matching, one notable difference was the proportion of biologic-naïve patients (67.2% [F1/F2] versus 100% [NCT00317499]). Logistic regression was used to determine weights for age, body weight, sex, race, PsA disease duration, presence of psoriasis (≥3% body surface area), mean HAQ-DI score, swollen joint count (SJC), CRP, methotrexate use and previous TNFi therapy failure. Recalculated outcomes from F1/F2 (SEC, effective sample size [ESS]=79; placebo, ESS=94) were compared with NCT00317499. Pairwise comparisons using odds ratios (ORs) were performed for American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50 and 70 responses at week 12 (placebo-adjusted) and week 24 (non-placebo-adjusted). Placebo-adjustment at week 24 was not possible as patients could receive active treatment from week 16.

RESULTS:

:
At week 12, no differences in placebo-adjusted ACR 20, 50 and 70 responses between SEC and ETN were observed. At week 24 (non-placebo-adjusted), ACR 70 responses were higher with SEC than ETN (OR [95% CI]: 3.06 [1.30–7.19], p= 0.010).

A sensitivity analysis excluding PsA disease duration, SJC and CRP from the matching confirmed these results.

CONCLUSIONS:

:
In this MAIC, secukinumab showed evidence of superiority for symptomatic improvement (non-placebo-adjusted ACR 70) over etanercept for active PsA at 24 weeks.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-09, ISPOR Latin America 2017, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PMS6

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×