COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF POSACONAZOLE VERSUS FLUCONAZOLE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS IN ACUTE LEUKEMIA PATIENTS IN COLOMBIA

Author(s)

Sung A1, Monsanto H2, Ruiz J3, Beltran C3, Rojas M3, Cortes MF4, Alvarez C5, Garzon J5
1Merck & co. Inc, Nj, NJ, USA, 2Latin America Health Outcomes Research, carolina, Puerto Rico, 3Merck Sharp & Dhome, Bogota, Colombia, 4Alvarez Gotuzzo Asociados S en C, BOGOTA, Colombia, 5Alvarez Gotuzzo Asociados S en C, Bogota, Colombia

OBJECTIVES:: Posaconazole is effective as primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A cost-effectiveness analysis of posaconazole versus standard azole therapy (SAT) has not been conducted in Colombia. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of posaconazole (standard azole therapy in Colombia) compared to fluconazole for IFI prevention in AML patients with chemotherapy-induced prolonged neutropenia in Colombia.

METHODS:: We adapted a decision-analytic model based on phase III clinical trial data (probabilities of IFI, IFI-related death, and other death within 100 days) to Colombia, to assess the cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus Fluconazol (FLU) in the prevention of IFIs among patients with acute myeloi leukemia (AML) from the third payer perspective. We obtained IFI-related costs within 100 days and healthcare resource utilization from an expert committee via a modified Delphi method. Retrospectively we reviewed resource utilization related to AML, antifungal prophylaxis, and IFI for AML patients receiving primary antifungal prophylaxis in a Colombian hospital. Unit costs were captured from hospital and pharmacy pricelists (Colombian pesos; COP) at December 2016 values from a third-party payer perspective. The model predicts IFIs avoided, life-years saved (LYS), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; incremental cost per IFI avoided/per QALY) RESULTS:: Posaconazole was associate with fewer cases of IFI (0.041 vs 0.11; p=0.003) and increased life years (2.75 vs 2.54). Estimated mean prophylaxis costs per patient were COP$5.558597 (1,821 USD) with posaconazole and COP$659.091 (216 USD) with fluconazole. Over a lifetime horizon, posaconazole prophylaxis resulted in 0.2146 discounted LYS. The resulting incremental cost is COP$19,976,639 (6.543 USD) per QALY that is below of 3 gross domestic product (GDP), currently accepted in Colombia.

CONCLUSIONS:: Posaconazole is cost-effective compared with SAT when used as antifungal primary prophylaxis in AML patients with chemotherapy-induced prolonged neutropenia in Colombia.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-09, ISPOR Latin America 2017, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PIN27

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×