STAKEHOLDER EVIDENCE REQUIREMENTS AND PRICE EXPECTATIONS FOR BIOSIMILARS IN THREE ASIAN MARKETS

Author(s)

Akpinar P1, Saraf S1, Severi Bruni D2, Li X3, Liu C4, Sherwin G1
1ICON Pricing and Market Access, London, UK, 2ICON Pricing and Market Access, San Francisco, CA, USA, 3ICON Commercialisation & Outcomes, London, UK, 4ICON Pricing and Market Access, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: Between 2011 and 2015, 32 biologics valued at more than $55 billion are expected to lose patent protection across the world (Datamonitor 2011). The biologics patent cliff has presented a huge opportunity for biosimilar manufacturers. In the context of this growing biosimilars market, this research aimed to investigate the regulatory environments and the evidence (clinical, economic and humanistic) requirements to support reimbursement and prescription of biosimilar drugs in three Asian markets (Japan, South Korea and China).  METHODS: We conducted secondary research to review the macroeconomic factors impacting biosimilar entry (regulatory policy, intellectual property protection etc.) Payer/ physician guidance and positions on biosimilar use across markets and diseases were also reviewed. Following this, primary research was conducted with a mix of payers and physician stakeholders to understand:
  • The therapy areas that payers/physicians consider most attractive for biosimilars;
  • Payer/physician value drivers and evidence requirements (bioequivalence, comparative data etc.) across therapy areas that would support public reimbursement and prescription   
  • Expectations around price differentials vs. branded biologics and the implications these differentials have on access and utilization of biosimilars 
RESULTS: Evidence requirements vary by market, with Japan and S.Korea being fairly consistent while China having lower thresholds. Evidence requirements also tend to vary by therapy area and complexity of the biologic. Overall, efficacy/ safety data and price are key value drivers for biosimilar reimbursement and uptake. In the absence of comparative data vs. the branded biologic, concerns around safety/efficacy may impact uptake but the promise of significant budget savings supports positive reimbursement/ access decisions.   CONCLUSIONS: The access environments for biosimilars in the developed markets of Japan and S.Korea can be expected to be similar to other developed markets across the world. However, China is likely to be more favourable than the developed markets when it comes to access and uptake of biosimilars.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2014, Beijing, China

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)

Code

PMS28

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Prescribing Behavior, Pricing Policy & Schemes, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders, Oncology, Sensory System Disorders, Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×