A RETROSPECTIVE, LONGITUDINAL STUDY TO INVESTIGATE THE CHANGE OF LDL-C LEVEL AND PHARMACEUTICAL INTERVENTION BY USING JAPANESE health care CHECKUP DATABASE
Author(s)
Tomita C1, Ii Y2, Shima D2, Yamamoto Y3, Nagayasu S3, Suga O2, Fujimoto Y2
1Pfizer Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan, 2Pfizer Japan Inc, Tokyo, Japan, 3MinaCare co.ltd, Tokyo, Japan
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the LDL-c levels and pharmaceutical interventions in Japanese subjects under real life settings based on longitudinal data from a Japanese healthcare checkup database developed by MinaCare Co. Ltd. METHODS: Data of those subjects with annual health checkup from 2010 to 2012 were extracted from MinaCare database (cutoff November 2013). From these data, 11830 subjects with 3 years of parameter values (LDL-c, etc.) were used to assess their longitudinal changes and the self-reported use of medications. The reliability of MinaCare database has been evaluated in a separate investigation to be presented at ISPOR 19th Annual International Meeting. The final report of this investigation will be based on the latest of the periodically updated database at reporting. RESULTS: At baseline (2010), 11.9% (1410/11830) of the subjects reported LDL-c≥160 mg/dL (target level for low risk hyperlipidemia population). Despite these high LDL-c values, 95.4% (1345/1410) of these subjects answered “untreated by anti-hyperlipidemia drug” (including one non-respondent). Among these 1345 subjects, 1257(93.5%) answered “untreated” again in 2011; and among these “untreated”, the proportions of subjects with LDL-c<140 (diagnositic level for hyperlipidemia), 160<LDL-c≤180 and LDL-c≥180 in 2011 were 13.5%(n=170), 32.9%(n=413) and 22.9%(n=228), respectively. In contrast, among those who answered “treated” in 2011, the proportion with LDL-c<140 was dramatically higher (69.8%, n=60).Additionally, among those who answered “untreated” in 2011, the proportion answering “untreated” in 2012 (i.e. “untreated” in 3-consecutive years) was 94.1% (n=1183); among these subjects, the proportions of subjects with LDL-c<140, 160<LDL-c≤180 and LDL-c≥180 in 2012 were 16.5%(n=195), 29.8%(n=352) and 25.0%(n=296), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation showed that >90% of subjects self-reported no treatment with anti-hyperlipidemia drugs, despite LDL-c levels above 160 mg/dL. Many reported themselves untreated for 3 years. These results revealed a potentially critical gap between healthcare checkup results and subject’s behavior to access medical treatment, suggesting more effective interventions to modify behavior is required.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2014-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2014, Beijing, China
Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 7 (November 2014)
Code
PCV57
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Public Health
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders