RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN INSTRUMENT USED IN A TOBACCO CESSATION INTERVENTION STUDY AMONG PATIENTS WITH DIABETES

Author(s)

Ibrahim KA1, Syed Sulaiman SA2, Shafie AA3, Awaisu A4, Lajis R1, Nasution A21Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang, Malaysia, 2Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, 3Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia, 4Qatar University, Doha, Doha, Qatar

OBJECTIVES: To report on the reliability and validity of an instrument used among diabetic patients who smoke. The instrument that was designed and pretested is a 41-item questionnaire to evaluate knowledge on diabetes, physician practice, and their attitudes towards a smoking cessation intervention when applied by their physicians. METHODS: We developed the questionnaire based on information drawn from the literature related to diabetes care and management and smoking negative effect. Questions were adapted and modified from other relevant literature. To ensure face, content and construct validity, the questionnaire was reviewed by six pharmacists, five of whom were faculty members with experience and expertise in survey instruments development and research. Modifications suggested included, but not limited to adding multiple choice responses to some of the knowledge and practice items, moving some of the knowledge items to the practice section, adding questions to the knowledge domain, and lastly putting the attitude questions in a table format which was easier to be understood. The questionnaire was modified accordingly and sent for a second review. The questionnaire was readable by respondents with at least grade 6 education level. The reconciled and modified version was sent to be translated to Malay language, which is the national language of Malaysia. The translation was validated using the standard forward and backward method. RESULTS: The questionnaire was pretested on a convenient sample of 85 patients. Reliability analysis of the questionnaire using Cronbach’s alpha showed an internal consistency reliability of 0.9 for the attitude domain. The reliability of four knowledge items was measured by the split-half reliability method; the Spearman-Brown and Guttman Split-Half Coefficients were 0.6;  and 0.56, respectively.  CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire was valid and reliable to evaluate diabetic knowledge, physician practice, and attitude towards the smoking cessation intervention when applied by their physicians.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2012-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2012, Taipei, Taiwan

Value in Health, Vol. 15, No. 7 (November 2012)

Code

PRM32

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×