A HEALTH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE LONG-TERM OUTCOMES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH USING CANAGLIFLOZIN VERSUS SITAGLIPTIN AS AN ADD-ON TO METFORMIN (MET) IN MEXICO
Author(s)
Teschemaker AR1;Neslusan C1;Puig A*2;Valencia A3;Johansen P4, Willis M4 1Janssen Global Services LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA, 2Johnson and Johnson World Headquarters, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 3Janssen Cilag Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, 4The Swedish Institute for
OBJECTIVES: Canagliflozin (CANA) is a novel inhibitor of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 in development for treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In a previously reported randomized, double-blind, 4 arm parallel group (placebo, CANA 100mg, CANA 300mg and sitagliptin 100mg [SITA]) study of 1284 subjects inadequately controlled on MET monotherapy, CANA 100mg and 300mg significantly decreased HbA1c versus placebo after 26 weeks of therapy by 0.62% and 0.77%, respectively; SITA decreased HbA1cversus placebo by 0.65%. In this trial, both CANA doses and SITA significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (CANA 100mg: 5.36 mmHg; CANA 300mg: 6.58 mmHg; SITA 3.34 mmHg), however, only CANA significantly reduced body weight (CANA 100mg: 2.5%; CANA 300mg: 2.9%) versus placebo. The objective of this study was to simulate the health outcomes and associated costs attributable to using CANA versus SITA in Mexico. METHODS: Forty-year outcomes associated with adding CANA 100mg or CANA 300mg versus SITA to MET were simulated using ECHO (Economic and Health Outcomes)-T2DM, a validated micro-simulation model. Treatment effects and patient characteristics were sourced from the trial. Simulated treatment was intensified when HbA1cexceeded 7.5% by adding basal insulin, and subsequently prandial insulin. Disutilities associated with micro- and macro-vascular events were obtained from the literature and costs were adapted to the Mexican setting. RESULTS: Using CANA 300mg versus SITA was projected to reduce relative risks for key events (e.g. myocardial infarction 10.2%; congestive heart failure 6.6%; macroalbuminuria 6.6%; microalbuminuria 6.2%), improve QALYs (0.046), and result in lower costs per patient ($1927MXN). Simulation results of CANA 100mg versus SITA were generally similar, albeit estimates of reductions in relative risks, QALY gains and associated costs differences were smaller. CONCLUSIONS: These simulations suggest that using CANA versus SITA as an add-on to MET could result in improved outcomes and reduced costs in Mexico.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2013-09, ISPOR Latin America 2013, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)
Code
PDB12
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders