EVALUATING THE CHOICE OF PEN VS. SYRINGE- IMPLICATIONS FOR LONG TERM DIABETES MANAGEMENT

Author(s)

Brod M1, Thomsen TL2, Christensen T21The Brod Group, Mill Valley, CA, USA, 2Novo Nordisk A/S, Virum, Denmark

OBJECTIVES: The two most commonly used insulin delivery devices, pens and syringes, have comparable safety profiles and efficacy under similar use conditions.  Therefore, the decision regarding the preferred device must be based on other considerations such as treatment satisfaction, treatment adherence, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), health care expenditure and utilization. METHODS: A literature search was conducted of published articles in peer reviewed journals listed in the US National Library of Medicine’s PubMed (1948-present), DIALOG including PsychInfo (1887-Present), EMCARE (nursing lit., 1995-Present), BIOSIS (1993-Present), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica, 1974-Present), SciSearch (1990-Present) and MEDLINE. Relevant manuscripts were classified into subcategories based on the major focus of the article reviewed and then subcategories were collapsed into major categories: treatment satisfaction, treatment adherence, HRQoL, and health care expenditure and utilization. RESULTS: A total of 135 publications were reviewed for inclusion of which 73 manuscripts and 9 conference abstracts/poster were deemed relevant and reviewed in depth.   Seventeen reported findings from clinical trials and 13 were review articles. There is substantial evidence demonstrating the superior benefits of pens over syringes. Treatment satisfaction and patient preference for pens over syringes was widely reported and patients reported that pens provided them with increased confidence in dose, ability to self-inject, superior convenience and overall ease of use.  Pen users reported better treatment adherence and fewer missed insulin doses which may account for the reported better HbA1c control than with syringe. Health care expenditure and utilization were higher in the short term for pens, however, these expenditures were minor in comparison with long-term savings that result from improved decreases in hospitalizations, incidence of side effects, physician visits and emergency department visits. CONCLUSIONS: Long and short term diabetes management should benefit from the choice of pen as the insulin delivery method based on PRO outcomes and long term cost effectiveness.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2010-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2010, Phuket, Thailand

Value in Health, Vol. 13, No. 7 (November 2010)

Code

PDB17

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×